My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 10/25/89
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1980-1989
>
1989
>
PC 10/25/89
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/19/2017 10:43:41 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 3:36:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
10/25/1989
DOCUMENT NAME
10/25/89
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
f~eso:l a_ati on No_ PC-89-S'7 was entered and adopted r-ec ommendi ng <br />approval of the Negative Decl ar ati ors prepared for Case f2Z--S9-11 <br />as mot i c->n ed _ <br />ROLL CALL _VOTE, <br />AYES. Commi ssi oners L-<erger ~ Horan ., Hovi nets ~ Matsern ., ar-sd <br />C tsai rman Mi ctsel otti <br />NOES a None <br />ABSEN-f'e None <br />ABS-TAINe None <br />Resolution No_ F•C-8S>-9E3 was entered and adopted recommending <br />approval o-P Gase RZ-~-E79--11 as mati onc=d_ <br />PVD=88 _~-_4M_s-_S tiri mall ~t a_1 <br />Appt i cati on for a mayor modification to an approved p1 anned uni t <br />development to al 1 ow open ~ wrought-i ron fencing al ong the rear <br />property 1 3 nes of Lots 20 ~ 21 ~ 22 ~ and 23 of Tract 5948 <br />C28~79-285 Victoria Ridge Court> Zoning for the property is <br />PUD (Pl anned Unit Daavel op mant) - Medium Denci ty Residential <br />Di stri ct_ <br />M~~. Eri c4::son pr esentF~d the staff r-ec ommersdi ng appr oval of <br />PUD-88-~-~-41`9 sub-jec_t to the conditions of the staff report. <br />Commi ssi on er Hovi ngta as4eed 1"Ir Eric 4: son tsow vi sib 1 e a redwood <br />f once would be i n comp ari son to a wr ought iron f ante -f r-orn <br />Vineyard Avenue. Wir _ Eri cfcson felt i t would be vi si bl e ~ but not <br />obtrusi ve_ <br />Commi ssi on er t~ior an asFsed the distance from L_ot 21 to Or of i no <br />Gourt _ i"Ir _ Eri ck:son said i t i s about 1.=. C> to GO ' from the edge <br />of the 1 of to t-l-ie nearest bat F:: yard ~ dep ending on whi ct~ 1 of i s <br />measured _ <br />Commi ssi on er t'Ic Gui rk asked how far the wrought iron fences wool d <br />befrom the slope. Mr. Eri cf~son said they era essentially mat <br />the top o{~ tt~e sl ope. <br />Ttl®_~ub 1,1 c-_taeari n_-g- was oo en ed. <br />Sammy St~ri mat i ~ owner of Lot '20 ~ re <br />presented the appl i a_-at i on _ <br />She said sne nas read the st. a-f f report and agrees to the <br />c ondi ti ons. She feels that the wr ot_<ght iron fences wi 11 enhance <br />the property and wool d rant negatively j. mp act= the nei ghbors. Stae <br />al so agreed to the additional 1 andsc aping _ <br />Commi ssi on er Mah ern ref erred to a drawl ng of the wrought iron <br />fence and as4:ed Wls_ St-.ri mal i whether the 1 andsc aping i s to come <br />within -four feet of tta e- si>. feet -f ence_ S'tae felt that the view <br />of the hi 1 1 s wo~al d r-aot be that mucta di f f-er er-st even i f ttie <br />r-ed wood {~ ences were ct-aarsged to wr-oug ttat iron _ <br />F•age 9 <br />_T _. ._. . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.