Laserfiche WebLink
Chairman M i ch e 1 ott i a s aced Mr _ Swift i f there a re a ny othe r <br />project s in 1 i ne f or deve 1 opment on the street _ Mr _ Swift s a i d he <br />fee 1 s that pe rhap s the Mo 1 i na ro a red Agu i rra p rope rty w i 1 1 want t o <br />deve 1 op a s s oon a s they a re annexed _ <br />The Commissioners d i s cus s ed the i s sue o f fa i rn e s s regarding the <br />c and it ion relating to ma i nt area nce o f the s t re et , with <br />Ms _ McMill ion stating that she did not wish to have an open-ended <br />1 i ab i 1 i ty _ <br />The pub l i c hear i ng wa s c l o s ed _ <br />Commissioner Mahern 1i)ced tying the repair of the road also to the <br />next property owner/ deve 1 ope r who c ome s a 1 ong a s we 1 1 s o that the <br />burden o f 1 i ab i 1 i ty w i 1 1 be shared _ <br />Comm i s s i one r Hov i ngh fe 1 t i f the c and i t i on re 1 a t i ng t o rep a i r o f <br />the road wa s t o be de 1 et ed , the road wou 1 d prob ab 1 y b e maintained <br />a s i t i s n ow _ <br />Chairman M i the l ott i s aid she wou 1 d 1 i]ce t o s e e the maintenance <br />condition postponed unt i 1 such t ime a s s ome on e e l s e d eve 1 op s_ <br />Mr_ Swift said the condition can be written to reflect future <br />deve 1 opment _ <br />A motion wa s made by C omm i s s i one r Mah e rn , s e c o nded by <br />Comm i s s i one r Hoyt that the Negative Dec 1 a rat i o n p rep a red f o r Ca s e <br />PUD- 8 9- 4 be adopted i na smuch a s p roj a c t app rova 1 wou 1 d have an <br />i n s i gn i f i ca nt adve rs e e £ fact on the e rev i ro nme nt _ <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br />AYES v Commissioners Hov i ngh , H oyt , Mahe rn , a red Chairman <br />M i the 1 ott i <br />NOES . None <br />ABSENT . Comm i s s i one r Berge r <br />ABS TAS N . None <br />Re s o t ut i on No _ PC - 8 9- 3 0 wa s entered a red a d opt e d re c ommand i ng <br />approval of the Negative Declaration as motioned _ <br />A motion wa s mad e by Comm i s s i one r Mahe rn , s ec onded by C omm i s s i one r <br />Hoyt that the deve 1 opment p l a n described i n C a s e PU D- 8 9- 4 i s <br />consistent with the Genera 1 P l a n a red th e purpose s o f the PUD <br />ordinance ; and recommend s app rova 1 o f C a s e PUD - 8 9- 4 subject to the <br />cored i t i on s shown i n the sta f f report ( a s revised ) w i th the <br />following sentence added to the condition marKed ••New: •• <br />Such re spores ib i 1 ity sha 1 1 not b e re gti i re d unt i 1 a n add i t i ona 1 <br />two unit s a re app roved by the C i ty on T r e n e ry Drive _ <br />- 1 3 - <br />