PC 03/08/89 - Laserfiche WebLink

ROLL CALL VOTE AYES = Commissioners Hoyt , Mah e rn , and Cha i rma n M i the 1 ott i NOES . Commissioner Hov i ngh ABSENT a Commission er Berger ABSTAIN ~ None Re s o 1 ut i on No _ PC - 8 9 - 3 1 wa s entered and a d opt ed recommending approva 1 o f Ca s e PUD- 8 9- 4 a s motioned _ PUD- 8 9 - 5 _ DeS 1 Iva Grouv App1 i cat ion o £ DeS i 1va Group £or deve 1 opment p 1 an approva 1 to construct a 2 5 0 -unit s ingl e- £am i 1 y res ident i a 1 prof ect and re 1 ated improvements to be 1 ocated on an approximate 1 y 1 3 6 a cre s ite located at the northeast corner o £ the intersection o f Berne l Avenue and Footh i 1 1 Road _ Z on ing for the property i s PUD ( P1 armed Unit Deve 1 opment ) - Low Density Resident i a 1 D i s t r i ct _ Mr _ Swift p resented the s t a f f report recommending app rova 1 o f Ca s e PUD- 8 9 - 5 _ Commissioner Hov i ngh a s]ced whethe r o r not a s i i de a n a l y s i s wa s done £or the property _ Mr _ Swift stated that o ne wa s done on 1 y fo r the are a d i rect 1 y e a s t o f the a lobe _ The pub 1 i c hearing wa s opened _ Bob S i Iva , V i c e President , De S i t va G roue , urge d approva 1 o f the i t project _ Mr _ S i Iva l i s t ed h i s c on su 1 to nt s a nd gave a deta i led presentation o f h i s p roj e ct _ The p ro j e ct i s a 1 and p 1 an on 1 y and deve 1 opment p 1 ens w i 1 1 be submitted t o the C i ty a t a Future date _ Mr _ S i Iva d i s cu s s ed the s oundwa 1 1 to be bu i 1 t which w i 1 1 go approximate 1y 6 O O • wrapping i nt o the p roj e ct _ Mr _ S i 1 va anticipates wo rtc i ng out a 1 a nd s cap i ng ma i nten a n c e ag re ement w i th Ca 1 tra ns _ Regarding the pa rtt , they a nt i c i pa t e putting the improvement s i n during the P i rs t pha s e o£ c on s t ru ct i on and w i 1 1 a l s o improve the p a rlc i n Footh i 1 1 Kno 1 1 s_ In Unit B, Mr_ Silva reported that they hope to Piave the lots constructed by on e bu i 1 der , p rov i de a re c re a n o n a re a and oche r private open space _ Mr _ S i Iva s t at ed they agree w i th a l l 0£ the c o nd i t i on s a slced o f s to f f w ith the exception o£ No _ 2 7 re 1 at i ng t o the s i dewa 1 Ks _ They wou 1 d rather have the P 1 ann i ng Comm fi s s i o n a nd C i ty Counc i 1 design the s i dewa 1 7cs rattle r the n the i nd iv i due l h ome owne rs associat ion_ - 1 4 -