Laserfiche WebLink
Re s o t ut i on No _ PC - 8 9- 2 9 wa s entered a red adopt e d d e ny i ng <br />Ca s e PTJD- 8 8- 1 4_ <br />The applicant wa s advised that they Piave 1 5 d a y s i n which t o <br />apps a l th i s decision to the C i ty Council _ <br />PUD- 8 9 -4 _ Kamp /MCMi 1 1 1 on <br />App1 icat ion o f Dixie Kamp and Donna McMi 1 1 i on for deve 1 opment p 1 an <br />approva 1 to construct a s ingl e -farm 1y residence to be 1 ocated on <br />an approximate 1y one acre s its where there i s a n existing s ingl e- <br />fami 1y residence 1 ocated at 3 7 7 5 Trenery Drive _ Z on ing for the <br />property is PUD (Planned Unit Development) - Medium Density <br />Res ident i a 1 District _ <br />Mr _ Swi ft presented the st a f f report recommending approva 1 0 £ th i s <br />case ~ stating that he ha s d i st r i but ed s ome revised p rop o s ed <br />condition s o f approva 1 £o r c on s i derat i on o£ th e Commissioners _ <br />Comm i s s i one r Mahern spoke to the new recommended cored it i on s <br />stating she fee 1 s i t to b e un £a i t th a t one 1 of owns r be <br />re spore s ib 1 e for the maintenance o £ the entire s t re et _ <br />Comm i s s i oners Hoyt and Hov i ngh agreed w ith th i s c once rn _ <br />Mr _ Swi ft stated that there i s no a l t e rn a t eve a s t2-ie re wou l d be no <br />one re spore s ib i e fo r the repa i t o f the road b e c au s e i t i s a p r ivate <br />street _ Furthe r p o 1 i ce and £ ire cannot u s e a road sh ou 1 d i t get <br />f i 1 1 ed w i th potho 1 e s~ etc . U 1 t imate 1 y a s p rop e rt i e s a re d eve 1 oped <br />on the street th i s s ame c and i t i o n wou 1 d be app 1 i ed t o th o s e <br />d eve 1 opment s causing others t o a l s o b e re sp on s ib 1 e f o r the <br />maintenance . Mr . Swi £t then d e s cu s s ed th e wa t e r a red s ewer 1 i ne <br />locations and the fact that they wi11 be extended by the <br />deve 1 ope rs a s deve 1 opment o c cu rs _ <br />Commissioner Hoyt a stied i£ the C i ty ha s s ome K i rid o£ 1 i ab i 1 i ty _ <br />Mr _ Swi £t stated that th e road i s p r ivate and the C i ty ~ there £ o re <br />ha s no 1 i ab i 1 ity _ Mr _ Swift reported that th e C i ty can • t <br />ma rota i n a private road _ I t i s the ove rwhe 1 m i ng d e s i re o f the <br />resident s o f the a rea that i t rema i n a p r iva t o road . <br />Comm i s s i one r Hov i ngh a slced i f Kamp/McM i 1 1 i on i s paying C i ty taxes _ <br />Mr _ Swi £t stated the property i s i n the proce s s o f annex i rig _ The <br />property owners cannot subdivide th e p rope rty i£ i t s tay s i n the <br />County _ <br />The pub t i c hearing wa s opened _ <br />Donna McM i 1 1 i on ~ 4 4 5 4 S he a rwate r, represented Mrs _ Kamp ~ Pie r <br />mother . Ms McM i 1 1 i on i red i ca ted that they ag r e e w i th th e sta f f <br />report a red revised proposed condition s o £ approva 1 e xc ept w i th <br />regard to ma i me na nce o £ th e road _ Ms _ McM i 1 1 i on c ontended the t <br />the road ha s a 1 way s been kept i n good repa i t a red there i s no <br />reason t o think it w i 1 1 not b e s o i n th e future _ S h e d i d not want <br />a condition o£ such 1 i ab i 1 i ty p 1 a ced on h e r d eve 1 opment _ <br />- 1 2 - <br />