My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 03/08/89
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1980-1989
>
1989
>
PC 03/08/89
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/19/2017 10:45:50 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 3:07:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
3/8/1989
DOCUMENT NAME
03/08/89
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Hovingh would like to see a recreation area in the <br />deve 1 opment , and fee 1 s there a re too many 1 of s _ He wool d 1 i Ke t o <br />s ee a bypa s s connecting Dub t i n Canyon Road t o Fo oth i 1 1 Road _ As <br />i t now stand s the ent ranc e to the deve 1 opment f rom Footh i 1 1 Road <br />must come from S toner i dge Drive . He wou 1 d support the p ro j ect but <br />wou 1 d fee 1 more com fo rtab 1 e w i th a recreation a re a i n the m i dd 1 e <br />o f the two b ig concentrations o £ homes _ <br />Commissioner Mahe rn commented that Pete r He 1 1ma n ha s b e e n active 1y <br />involved in t ry i ng to addre s s the concerns expressed by the <br />P1 ann i ng Commission and C i ty Counc i 1 _ Many thing s ma ace s ens e i n <br />th i s proj ect , 1 ilte having coat ro 1 ove r what e a ch i nd iv idea 1 Pious e <br />w i 1 1 1 ooK 1 i Ke _ Wh i 1 e she i s w i 1 1 i ng to to ke on such a ch a l l enge , <br />she cannot support the p ro j ect _ S he doe sn • t th i nK the p roduct i s <br />appropriate for the h i 1 1 s w ith or w ithout th i s coast ro 1_ <br />Comm i s s i one r Mahern stated i t appears we a re t ry i ng to h i de <br />something that we a re not p rood o £ _ Cha i rma n M i the 1 ott i agree s <br />with Commissioner Mahe rn _ Regard i ng the comparison to Go 1 den <br />Eag 1 e, the only s im i 1 a r i t em i s that they a re b oth on Footh i 1 1 <br />Road _ Chairman Mi the 1 ott i reviewed the to rra i n o £ both <br />deve 1 opment s_ S he s tated that the h i 1 1 s o f P l e a s ant on a re s o <br />p re c i ous and that she wou 1 d wo rK t o ma i nt a i n th e i ntegr i ty o f <br />the s e h i 1 1 s_ <br />A motion wa s mad e by C omm i s s i on e r Mahe rn , s e c o nded by Comm i s s i on e r <br />Hov i ngh certifying that they have reviewed a n d considered the <br />information contained i n the Draft a nd F i na 1 E S R and have <br />determined it to be comp 1 et e and i n c omp Z i a nc a w i th CEQA _ <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br />AYES v Commissioners Hov i ngh , Hoyt , Ma he rn , and Chairman <br />M i the 1 ott i <br />NOES . None <br />ABS ENT . Commissioner Berge r <br />ABSTAIN . None <br />Re s o 1 ut i on No _ PC - 8 9 - 2 8 wa s ent e red and adopted certifying the E S R <br />prepared for Ca s e PUD- 8 8- 1 4 wa s motioned _ <br />A motion wa s made by Comm i s s i one r Mah e rn , s ec and ed by Commissioner <br />Hoyt that Ca s e PUD- 8 8- 1 4 be denied f o r a l l o f th e reason s 1 i steel <br />i n the s to f f report _ <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br />AYES c Commissioners Hoyt , Mah e rn , a nd Cha i rma n M i the 1 ott i <br />NOES c C omm i s s i one r Hov i ngh <br />ABS ENT . Comm i s s i one r Berge r <br />ABSTAS N . None <br />- 1 1 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.