PC 02/22/89 - Laserfiche WebLink

t o deve 1 op un l e s s the roadway wa s moved to the m idd 1 e to a c c ommodate more th an two l of s_ Chairman M i the 1 ott i g ever a l l y supported the proposed proj a ct _ A motion wa s made by Commissioner Barger , s econded by Comm i s s i one r Hov i ngh ( 1) that approve 1 o f Ca s e PUD- 8 8- 1 5 wou 1 d have an i ns i gn i f i cant advers a o f fect on the environment and that a n egat ive dec 1 a rat i on be adopted , ( 2 ) that case PU D- 8 8 - 1 5 be recommended f or approve l subj ect to the coed i t i on s o f the s to f f report f i nd ing that the development p l an i s consistent w i t2-i tYi e Genera 1 P 1 an and the purpose s o f the PUD Ordinance _ ROLL CALL VOTE AYES v Commissioners Berger , Hov ingh , Hoyt , and Chairman M i the 1 ott i NOES . Comm i s s i one r Mahern ABSENT . None ABS TAS N c None Re s o 1 ut i on No _ PC - 8 9 - 1 7 wa s entered and adopted app rov i ng th e Negative Dec 1 a rat i on f o r Ca s e PUD- 8 8- 1 5 Re s o 1 ut i on No _ PC- 8 9 - 1 8 wa s entered and adopted recommending app rove 1 o P Ca s e PUD- 8 8- 1 5 a s motioned _ GP- 8 9- 1 C it o f P1 ea Banton App l icat i on o f the C ity o f Pleasanton to amend the C i rcul at i on Element o f the Genera l Plan by real ign i ng V ineya rd Avenue at it s intersection with C 1 era Lane to a stra fighter configuration _ Mr _ Quag 1 i a p resented the st a f f report recommending the rea 1 i gnment o f V i neya rd Avenue _ Chairman M i the 1 ott i a s ked Mr _ Quag Z i a i f he had addressed the Mo 1 i na ro dump s ite i n the st a f f report _ Mr _ Quag 1 i a stated that it i s no 1 onger a ma j o r concern a s it appears , i n to 1 k i ng t o property owners , that the a rea d i s cu s s ed most 1 i 3ce 1 y d i d not have f 1 Z 1 On 1t _ Comm i s s i one r Hov i r~gh a s ked about a County pe rm i t i n p rote s s to bu i l d a p r ivate road i n the v i c i n i ty _ Mr _ Quag Z i a reviewed the impending 1 it igat i on before the County , stating the road wou 1 d b e a sma 1 1 p r ivate one that wou 1 d go between the Do s]c i/A 1 1 e c property going i nto a cu 1 - de - s a c to the s oath _ The i s sue , apparent 1 y , i s c l o s e to re s o t ut i on _ The Commission member s then d i s cu s s ed with Mr _ Qu a g 1 i a the approximate 1 y 1 0± a c re s it e uncle r l i t igat i on _ - 5 -