PC 02/22/89 - Laserfiche WebLink

w i th i n the proper C ity f rameworK _ He raa 1 i z a s there i s a n Ap r i 1 1 deadline , but ha d i d not s ee the current p l an unt i t l a s t Thursday _ Roge r Manning then responded t o comment s o f the previous speaKer s _ Mr _ Manning i nd i c ated that he had met earlier in the day w i th Mr _ Thompson and the p 1 an suggested by Mr _ Thompson wou l d not wo rK on the property a s the road Zia s now been moved north £o r the b ene £ it o £ other neighboring properties _ S £ they now tried t o swap 1 and w i th Mr _ Thompson , Lot s 7 , 8 , and 9 wou 1 d have to be very deep and f rom an eng i Weer i rag standpoint th i s wou 1 d not worK _ Comm i s s i one r Mahern commented that Lot No _ 3 cou l d b e g iven up _ Mr _ Manning stated that the road wa s moved north t o accommodate the Marsha 1 1 a nd other properties , thus , Comm i s s i one r Mahe rn • s suggestion wou 1 d not work_ Cha i rma n M i the 1 ott i stated that there apparent 1y i s no way t o wo rK out Mr _ Thompson • s request _ She a s aced Mr _ Manning i £ Yee wou 1 d rathe r go ahea d w ith the p rof ect o r have i t continued _ Mr _ Manning stated that Yee ha s to 1 Ked t o the eng i nee r about the Thompson prop o s a 1 a nd it wou 1 d not work_ Further , they have postponed the i t pub l i c hearing s s o Mr _ Thompson cou l d review the p 1 an _ They now a sK the P 1 ann i ng Commission to t a3ce a ct i on _ Mr _ Quag Z i a stated that sta £ f ha s 1 oolcad at various a 1 tern a t iv a s and there i s not enough property on the Thompson p a rce 1 a s a stand a 1 one t o dove 1 op _ The pub l i c hearing wa s c l o s ed _ Commissioner Berger stated she be 1 i eve s the property i s d i f f i cu 1 t t o dove 1 op and the propo s a l appears to be a good s o t ut i on , e sp ec i a 1 1 y w ith the s treet configuration a s shown _ Comm i s s i one r Hoyt agreed w ith the comment s o£ C omm i s s i one r Barge r and commended the app 1 i cant w ith th i nK i ng o £ future dove 1 opment o £ the area and to 1 K i ng to the neighbors _ Commissioner Mahe rn wa s concerned w i th the ne ighb o r i ng p rop e rty not being deve 1 oped a 1 ong w ith the Mavr i d i s property _ S he f e l t p e rhap s a study i s i n the works and po s s ib l y the Commission sh ou l d wa i t for the entire p 1 an on the north s ide o f S yc amo re _ Commissioner Mahern stated , however , that i £ the othe r Commission members a re i n Favor o f the proj ect , she wou 1 d g o a 1 ong w i th the consensus _ C omm i s s i one r Hov i ngh supported the project bac au s e i t doe s taKe int o consideration dove 1 opment o£ other surrounding p rope rt i e s t o the north _ Chairman M i the 1 ott i expressed concern w ith Mr _ Thompson • s p 1 i ght , but she £e 1 t sta f£ ha s answered that it wou 1 d be a d i££ i cu 1 t s i t e -4-