PC 02/22/89 - Laserfiche WebLink

The pub l i c hear i ng wa s opened _ S tan i ey Rathbone , 3 2 5 Ray S treat , P 1 ea s anton , a sKed f o r a c opy o£ the p 1 an showing the rea 1 ignment _ S to f £ furnished Mr _ Rathbone with a b 1 ue 1 fine p 1 an _ Tom Linde nmeye r , E BRPD , Env i ronme nta 1 S pec i a 1 i st addressed the Commission _ Mr _ Li ndenmeye r tooK i s sue w i th the Negative Declaration ii]a smuch as it does not show whether or not the project wou 1 d e i ther reduce or e 1 im i Hate a cce s s t o the 1 and s o f E BRPD ~ and i t doe s n• t identify the o f fact that c ou l d re s a l t i n growth _ Commissioner Hoyt as7ced Mr _ Li nde nmeyer how he felt about the a 1 i gnme nt proposed fo r V ineya rd Avenue _ Mr _ L i ndenmey e r s a i d they wou 1 d 1 cave that up t o the j udgment o f the C i ty , they a re interested i n preserving a cce s s to the i t property and avoiding a ny adve rs a e f f act _ Commissioner Hoyt a sKed i£ E BRPD p 1 armed t o u s e the bacK s i to _ Mr _ L i ndenmeyer stated that wh i 1 e there i s no o f f i c i a l p l an , there i s a p l an i n the wo r}cs i nvo lv i ng pub l i c u s e o f the pa rK 1 and s oath o f the Arroyo De 1 Va 1 1 e_ Comm i s s i one r Mahern d i s cus s ed w ith Mr _ Li ndenmeye r acce s s to the i t p roperty shoo 1 d V i neya rd Avenue be rea 1 igned _ Mr _ Lindemeyer s t at ed E BRPD did not want the rea 1 i gnment o f V i neya rd Avenue to p re c 1 ude the o r i g fine 1 V i neya rd Avenue f rom being a through street _ Stan 1 ey Rathb one , 3 2 5 Ray S tre et , fe 1 t the proposed a 1 i gnment shoo l d go s omewhe re between the two l oca t i ons shown on the p l a n _ Jane S chue ran , 8 6 5 C 1 a ra Lane , a stied i£ the cu l -de - s a c go e s straight o f f o f C l a ra Lane what wou l d happen t o the a c c e s s_ S h e d idn • t fee 1 Mr _ Al 1 e c wou 1 d 1 ilce d i rect a c c e s s a c ro s s h i s p rop e rty t o the p a rK _ She a l s o wanted to Know i f V i neya rd Avenue go e s straight and a c ro s s Do s}t i/A1 1 ec property who b ear s the bard e n o f the cost of that part on Vineyard Avenue_ Sf it bisected the Ha rr i s p roperty , then Ha rr i s wou l d have to pay fo r the improvements _ S f i t goe s a cro s s the Hat sash i~ Al 1 ec ~ Do s K i properties , the property owners wou 1 d have to bee r the cost _ Comm i s s i one r Hov i ngh then d i s cu s s ed a V i neya rd Avenue 1 0 op to th e E BRPD prop arty w ith Mrs _ S chueren _ Mrs _ S chueren stated that a cce s s to the a re a i s confusing now w ith peop 1 e t ry i ng t o u s e C 1 a ra Lane ~ a one way p r ivate road ~ to acc a s s the Be ra t 1 i s property _ Chairman M i the 1 ott i d i s cu s sad w i th Mr _ Quag Z i a acce s s to the l and s o f E BRPD _ Mr _ Quag Z i a s a i d i t wou 1 d be o f f the o l d road a s there i s a n existing 5 0• r i ght - o f -way s im i 1 ar to that required i n any re s ident i a 1 deve 1 opment _ Chairman M i the 1 ott i a slced i£ wh e n the l i t igat i on i s s ett 1 ed i f there wou 1 d b e a two - 1 ar'•e p r ivat e ro a d very c l o s e t o the proposed a 1 i gnment that the C i ty i s proposing _ Mr _ Quag Z i a stated that th i s i s c o rrect _ C_ Al 1 ec , 3 8 3 5 V ineya rd Avenue , wa s concerned w i th a cu 1- d e- s a c i f the road goe s s t ra fight _ I t w i 1 1 make an i s 1 a nd a round h i s property _ He P e l t that 1 0 0 yards o f cu 1 -de - s a c wou 1 d crea t o a - 6 -