Laserfiche WebLink
1 and sc ap ad patio area and wi 1 1 have wal Fci ny paths and a gated <br />~f ence for- security pur-pc>se:s for r-esidents. <br />Comrni ssi on er Mah ern asked if the ~6C! sgft_ room is for one or <br />two oceup antsy. h'Ir. S'h Letts said it would be for ai that- one or <br />two occupant>_ The rooms are fully f--urni sl-.ed~ however ~ the <br />rasi dents can br-i ng thai r- own par sonal possessions such as <br />pai r-atir-~q=> if thEly wish to do so_ <br />Comrni ssi or-<ar Horan as4ead i -f this f aci 1 i ty can be served by <br />vi si ti ng nut sE.s paid by the County _ Mr Shutts said this i s not <br />done as i t would thyn [_ome under- a con val. esc cnt f aci 1 i ty ruling _ <br />Commi ssi on er Mc[~ui r 4z as4ced i f the rooms have ptionc=s and TV s _ <br />Mr-. Sh Letts said 'they do have these amer~i t i ys. Commi ssi onyr- <br />Mc-_t~ui r 4=: as4ced i f the rysi der~ts would be chaps-r on ed _ i"Ir _ Sh utts <br />raspondyd that if ne[_essary the resi dents are chaperonyd_ <br />Cormi ssi on er- Mc_L~ui r 4: asked i f there i s a scurf ew. Mr _ Shuns <br />i ndi cat ad that the rani dr nts would nest nyyd a curfew ., as they <br />would probably not 'live in suci-i a facility if tt-~E.y were at>l E: to <br />yE:t ar-ound better . Chairman Berger agreed with Wlr Sh u'tts and <br />spo4~e of tear parents who live in a similar facility_ She said <br />-they c^an no 1 onyer- stay al onE:: they arc normal 1 y i. n bed by 9 <br />p _ m. She f al t a f ac i 1 i ty such as pr op os yd i s good whys an e1 der" <br />p er son goes from bei nq ac-t_i ve to not-so acti ve_ Cornmissioner- <br />Hovi ngh agreed wi th her st at emr?nts_ <br />Commi ssi on er Mc Gui rk: asFead i f the price for a semi ~-private room <br />wou'1 d remain the lama i f one parson 1 of t _ Mr _ Sh utts said the <br />pr-i ca does ramai n the same,: even i. f a parson gets to the poi nt <br />where tt, E~y cannot continua to pay., the=y era not forced to leaves. <br />C:omm:i ssi ones 1"lahern discussed the neighbors' concerns regarding <br />~tha hei-ght. of the structure which they contend will block their <br />vi yw of Mt . Di ab 1 0. Mr _ Sh utts said a si to study l-~as beer-a <br />c onductE.d and it has been ascertained that the proposed "~'8 ft. <br />1-~igh pr-oject would not blocFc the nai ghbors view of 'thy <br />mc~untain_ He noted the nearby rni ni--st or aye units err=- higtaar- <br />than the prop osed str-uctura_ He added that it app cars that vary <br />f yw hoes--aces on Mohr Avyn ua have a vi ew of Mt _ Di abl o_ <br />Cha:i r-man BF:_rgyr as4::ed i f there would be macl-aani cal aqui pmant on <br />the roof . !`~Ir . Sh offs rasp ended there would be equi pmant onl y <br />on thE. bpi tchyn and that would by screen ed_ <br />Commi ssi. over I~lcGui rF~ said he would 1 i. ke to sae soma part of the <br />pro.jact resyr vad for affordably use., such as some type of lease <br />agrE~emE_nt . <br />The-_~e_i b_lic_._-.h~~r_i ne3_was_ o~~n~d_-_ <br />M I NU-rE~3 <br />PLANNING GOMMISSIUN <br />Pages 1 ~4 <br />