My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 06:221
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2006
>
SR 06:221
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2006 4:57:20 PM
Creation date
9/14/2006 4:44:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
9/19/2006
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 06:221
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Resolution No. <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />The R-1-6,500 Zoning District requires a minimum lot width of 65 feet, <br />minimum lot depth of 100 feet, and a minimum area of 6,500 square feet. <br />At approximately 79 feet in width, 150 feet in depth, and 11,888 square <br />feet in area, the lot exceeds the minimum required lot width, depth, and <br />area for the R-I-6,500 District. However, the subject property is unique in <br />that it is moderately sloped and contains a pool immediately behind the <br />existing house. These factors make compliance with the separation <br />requirements more difficult on the subject lot than on flat lots without <br />pools located immediately adjacent to the rear of the home. Therefore, <br />there are circumstances unique to this property, and this first finding can <br />be made for the variance. <br /> <br />2. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special <br />privilege inconsistent with the limitation on other properties classified <br />in the same zoning district; <br /> <br />In order for this finding to be made, there must exist a relationship <br />between the special circumstances applicable to the property and the <br />variance in question. As stated above, the site topography and existing <br />pool are unique and limit the applicants' placement of additions within the <br />separation requirements. Therefore, there is direct relationship between <br />the uniqueness of the lot and the variance in question and that by granting <br />the subject variance, the applicant will not be granted a special privilege <br />that is inconsistent with other properties in the same zoning district. <br />Therefore, the second finding can be made. <br /> <br />3. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public <br />health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or <br />improvements in the vicinity. <br /> <br />The purpose for having separation and setback regulations is to allow for <br />open spaces for light, air, and views between properties, to prevent <br />excessive overcrowding oflands with structures, and to foster harmonious <br />and workable relationships among properties. The proposed additions <br />would meet the floor area ratio (FAR) and height regulations of the zoning <br />district, which are designed to control the overall mass and height of <br />structures on a property. Furthermore, the northern side addition is one- <br />story and approximately 17Y2-feet tall (measured from the ridge to the <br />adjacent grade). In addition, the proposed window on the northern side <br />elevation would be an under cabinet window with an upper frame height <br />of 6 feet as measured from the outside grade. Based on these factors, the <br />proposed addition would not be overbearing to the adjacent properties, <br />would not create privacy impacts, nor adversely impact the light, air, open <br />space, and views between properties. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.