SR 06:221 - Laserfiche WebLink

DRAFT ATTACHMENT 1 CITY COuNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION DENYING THE APPEAL (P AP-99) OF THE APPLICATION OF PETER SHUTTS/FINLAY BOAG AS FILED UNDER CASE PV-153/PADR-1536 WHEREAS, on June 15, 2006, the Zoning Administrator approved the variance and administrative design review applications of Peter ShuttslFinlay Boag for applications to construct additions to the existing dwelling at 4558 Second Street consisting of: 1) one-story additions totaling approximately 291 sq. ft. on the front, north side, and rear of the house; 2) two-story additions totaling approximately 294 sq. ft. on the southern side and rear of the house; 3) a porte-cochere and second-floor balcony on the southern side of the house; and 4) a covered front porch; and WHEREAS, zoning for the property is R-1-6,500 (Single-Family Residential) District; and WHEREAS, within the time specified by the Pleasanton Municipal Code, Dustin Boyce submitted an appeal (Case PAP-99) to the City of Pleasant on; and WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was held before the City Council on September 19, 2006, at which time all pertinent testimony and documents were reviewed; and WHEREAS, actions of this nature are categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); therefore, no environmental document was prepared for this proposal; and WHEREAS, after receiving public testimony and review of the materials presented, the City Council determined that the proposed design ofthe additions is compatible with the existing and surrounding homes and is appropriate. WHEREAS, the City Council made the following findings: 1. That because of special circumstances applicable to the property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, the strict application of the provisions of this chapter deprives such property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and under identical zoning classification;