My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 06:202
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2006
>
SR 06:202
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/3/2007 3:48:39 PM
Creation date
8/10/2006 2:42:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
8/15/2006
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 06:202
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
173
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />5. No fences are allowed in the front yard area except for low, decorative open fences not <br />exceeding 30 inches in height. <br />6. FAR calculation does not include 600 sq. ft. of garage area. Any squarc footage within the <br />garage greater than 600 sq .ft. would be included in the FAR calculation. <br /> <br />The proposal does not include development standards for Class I and/or Class II accessory <br />structures. Staff recommends that the development standards for accessory structures follow <br />those that are requircd for R-I-20,000 zoning district. Staff believes that the proposed <br />devclopment standards are appropriate and will enablc the project to be compatible with the <br />surrounding neighborhood. <br /> <br />The subject site is within the West Foothill Road Corridor Overlay District (WFRCOD). <br />However, the site does not adjoin Foothill Road and, therefore, it is not subject to these <br />development standards as to lot size, building setback, and building height. The proposed <br />development, however, is subject the dcsign criteria specified in WFRCOD in terms of foreridge <br />development, access/frontage improvements, landscaping, retaining walls, and fencing. The <br />project is designcd to meet these criteria. <br /> <br />DISCUSSION <br /> <br />The proposed homes on Lot I and Lot 3 are designed and would be constructed to meet the <br />Green Building Ordinance. In fact, the submitted green building checklist shows that the <br />proposed homes would achieve 91 green points which has exceeded the required 50 green points. <br /> <br />Minor grading would be performed on Lot I to separate it from Lot 2. Retaining walls not to <br />exceed three-feet in height would be constructed on Lot 3 to the south of the proposed house. <br />The grading plan shows a seven-foot elevation difference on Lot 3 between the driveway and the <br />house entrance. To overcome this grade difference and to provide practical access to the house <br />both internally (from the garage) and externally (from thc front yard), a rctaining wall between <br />Lot 2 and Lot 3 and/or steps may be utilized. It is conditioned that the final grading plan for Lot <br />3 include this retaining wall and/or steps. <br /> <br />City utilities are available on Dublin Canyon Road. Utilities serving the proposed development <br />would be located beneath the private street (Young Court). <br /> <br />Please refer to the Planning Commission staff report (Attachment 5) for additional information <br />and details ofthe project such as the site plan, landscaping, geotechnical investigation, noise <br />study, tree assessment, and protection of wildlife. <br /> <br />As part of the proposal, the applicant has submitted an arborist report prepared by HortScience, <br />a Biological Assessmcnt Study prepared by WRA, and a Noise study by Thorburn Associates. <br />In addition, the Geotechnical Review, prepared by Nicholas Engineering Corporation, was <br /> <br />SR:06:202 <br />Page 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.