My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 06:201
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2006
>
SR 06:201
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/28/2006 3:54:06 PM
Creation date
8/10/2006 2:32:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
8/15/2006
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 06:201
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />integrated into the roof of the house with dormers used for windows or to provide adequate <br />head clearance. The applicant is proposing to allow the primary building on Lot 5 to be 30 <br />feet in height and two stories. Staff believes that Lot 5 should be subject to the same two- <br />story parameters as Lots 3, 4, 6, and 7. <br /> <br />· Proposed building height would be measured vertically from the lowest finished grade to the <br />top of the roof ridge, excluding chimneys. The applicant is proposing to define the "finished <br />grade" as six inches below the top of the foundation. Staff recommends that the Specific <br />Plan height measurement be used: Building height is measured vertically from the lowest <br />elevation of the building to the highest elevation of the building, excluding chimneys. Staff <br />also recommends that language be added to clarifY that the "lowest elevation of the building" <br />is the lowest finished grade adjacent to an exterior wall of the house. <br /> <br />· The proposed 25-foot height limit proposed for accessory structures (excluding arbors, <br />trellises, gazebos, and related shade structures that are open on three sides which would be <br />limited to 12-feet in height) is consistent with the height limit specified in the Specific Plan. <br />The Specific Plan also indicates that accessory structures shall be limited to one story. Staff <br />recommends that this restriction be added to the guidelines. <br /> <br />Building Envelooes/Designated Develooment Areas <br /> <br />· Given the irregular-shaped lots, staff recommended that the applicant create building <br />envelopes for each lot rather than list minimum setbacks as it would be difficult to designate <br />the front, side, and rear yards for each lot. The proposed building envelopes, identified as <br />Designated Development Areas (DDA), have been provided in the guidelines and as a plan <br />sheet in the development plans. Although the Specific Plan allows "agricultural" accessory <br />structures to be located in the Open Space District areas of the lots, the applicant is <br />proposing to require all structures (Le., the main dwelling and all accessory structures, <br />including "agricultural" accessory structures) to be located within the Designated <br />Development Areas. <br /> <br />· The Specific Plan requires a 35-foot minimum front yard setback for HR lots. As noted <br />earlier, the Specific Plan allows building setbacks to be modified through the PUD approval <br />process. Given that the proposed flat pad areas would be limited in area, the applicant has <br />proposed to reduce the setbacks along the private street for Lots 1-4, and 6 and 7 to <br />approximately seven to ten feet, depending on the lot. Since the homes would front onto a <br />private hillside street with a small number of homes on it, staff does not believe that a 35- <br />foot setback is necessary and could be reduced. Staff finds the proposed setbacks to be <br />acceptable with one exception. Since the home on Lot 2 is going to be quite visible from <br />Old Vineyard Avenue and beyond, staff recommends that Lot 2 should have at least a 15- <br /> <br />Page - 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.