My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 06:201
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2006
>
SR 06:201
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/28/2006 3:54:06 PM
Creation date
8/10/2006 2:32:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
8/15/2006
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 06:201
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />because no trees would need to be removed for the house and grading on Lot I. Moving the <br />home site upslope on Lot 3 would allow the home to be placed on a shallower slope and would <br />reduce tree removal. Furthermore, although it places the home site at a higher elevation, the <br />home would be cut into the slope to minimize view impacts on the adjacent Roberts parcel (a <br />grading cross section has been provided in the development plans). Therefore, staff supports the <br />proposed location of the home site on Lot 3. <br /> <br />Architectural Design Guidelines <br /> <br />Since custom homes are proposed for all seven of the HR home sites, the applicant has prepared <br />a set of design guidelines and site development standards for the project ("The Estates on Oak <br />Ridge Architectural Design Guidelines") which addresses architecture, house size, setbacks, <br />building height, grading, fencing, landscaping, etc. <br /> <br />Staff believes that the guidelines are generally consistent with the requirements of the Vineyard <br />A venue Corridor Specific Plan and present a good set of development standards for the project. <br />However, staff recommends the following changes be made in order to more closely adhere to <br />some of the Specific Plan requirements and/or to help to clarifY the guidelines. <br /> <br />Floor Area Ratio <br /> <br />. While staff believes that the proposed floor area ratios (F ARs) and the resultant house sizes <br />are acceptable for the large hillside lots, we believe that garage area (attached or detached) <br />exceeding 700 square feet should be included in the FAR calculation. This requirement has <br />been used in other developments, most recently for the Mariposa Ranch subdivision. <br /> <br />Building Height <br /> <br />. In the HR District, the Specific Plan allows primary buildings to be 30 feet in height and two <br />stories, except that primary buildings located on existing elevations exceeding 540 feet are <br />limited to 25 feet in height and one story. Lots 3-7 would be located above an elevation of <br />540 feet. The Specific Plan indicates that site development standards such as building <br />setbacks and height shall be applied through the City's PUD development plan approval <br />process and may vary for unusual site conditions as long as any new standards are consistent <br />with the intent of the Specific Plan. In order to allow greater flexibility in the design and <br />assist in reducing the lot coverage, the applicant is proposing to allow Lots 3, 4, 6, and 7 to <br />be two stories under the following parameters: the second floor area doesn't exceed 20 <br />percent of the first floor area; the second floor shall be "set into" the roof of the home; and <br />the height shall not exceed 27 feet. Staff believes that it would be acceptable to allow two <br />story homes on Lots 3, 4, 6, and 7 using these parameters. Staff recommends that the <br />parameter for requiring the second floor to be "set into" the roofline be modified to state that <br />second floor walls must be set back from the first floor walls or that the second floor shall be <br /> <br />Page - 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.