My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 91013
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1990-1999
>
1991
>
RES 91013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/3/2012 3:47:44 PM
Creation date
7/27/1999 8:30:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
1/22/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Pleasanton's Sphere, outside of the Gateway. This capacity is a <br />major departure from the existing General Plan designation of <br />Agriculture which allows virtually no development. The addition <br />of up to 342 homes, plus possible related facilities such as a <br />golf course, plus the 80 to 320 homes allowed in the Gateway <br />would completely change the infrastructure requirements in the <br />area from what is currently planned. <br /> <br />As with the Gateway zoning, staff believes that the City should <br />build in as much flexibility as possible in this controversial <br />location. On one hand, this level of development could provide an <br />attractive, revenue producing gateway to both Pleasanton and the <br />vineyards. On the other hand, the City may wish to allow only <br />minimal development in the area and reserve its infrastructure <br />capacity for other parts of the City. The same arguments about <br />raising owners' expectations and increasing land values which <br />apply to the gateway also apply here. Therefore, staff would be <br />in favor of clarifying the language concerning allowable density <br />in this area to permit a range of density from zero up to one <br />unit per acre. This could be accomplished by strengthening the <br />language concerning the potential suitability of this land for <br />agricultural use and the provision that rezoning to PUD is <br />dependent on the full range of City design review and site <br />requirements which regulate all other activities in Pleasanton. A <br />better indication of desirable densities and holding capacities <br />can be determined by the outcome of the proposed Vineyard Avenue <br />General Plan Study, as proposed by the Planning Commission. <br /> <br />Non-Developable Land: The Plan prohibits development in areas <br />exceeding 25% in slope, containing significant sand and gravel <br />deposits, containing an arroyo, or being in public ownership. <br />These conditions are the same as those in the City's General Plan <br />and do not pose a conflict with existing City policies. Within <br />the City's Sphere, these conditions generally apply to lands <br />outside the Gateway north of Vineyard Avenue, which are <br />significant sand and gravel deposits. <br /> <br />Jurisdictional Control <br /> <br />The Concept Plan states that cities shall have the first <br />opportunity to process development applications for projects <br />within their Sphere-of-Influence, but the County can step in if <br />the City rejects an application. Staff recommends stronger <br />language to indicate that Pleasanton will be the designated <br />reviewing agency and that development, if any, will be to City <br />standards. Therefore, staff recommends that language should be <br />added to clarify that Pleasanton is the intended jurisdiction for <br />planning and annexing land within its Sphere of Influence and <br />that any development within the City Sphere should be serviced <br />according to City design standards and levels of service. <br /> <br />SR:91:30 <br /> <br /> -8- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.