My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 91013
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1990-1999
>
1991
>
RES 91013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/3/2012 3:47:44 PM
Creation date
7/27/1999 8:30:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
1/22/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ruby Hill <br /> <br />It is not completely clear to what extent the Concept Plan would <br />influence the proposed 1,300 acre Ruby Hill project. The ratio <br />of cultivable to non-cultivable lands on the site suggest that <br />the present proposal would need to be redesigned so that more of <br />the 600 acres of cultivable lands within the project were <br />undeveloped. However, the Plan provides for additional <br />cultivable land to developed if an equal amount of land elsewhere <br />in the Study Area is preserved in agricultural use through the <br />purchase of conservation easements. If Ruby Hill chose this <br />option, additional cultivable land could be developed. <br />Approximately 675 acres of the site are considered conditionally <br />developable at a gross density of one unit per acre. Therefore, <br />the site could potentially contain approximately 820 homes (675 + <br />120 representing 20% of cultivable lands + 24 on remaining <br />cultivable land), assuming no use of the cultivable land credit <br />provision. This holding capacity is similar to Signature <br />Properties~ latest proposal of 850 homes on the site. However, <br />the site plan would need to be revised so that the golf course <br />and housing was largely contained on the conditionally <br />developable lands, and the vineyard lands expanded from roughly <br />300 acres to 480 acres. The project would also require <br />substantial mitigation fees to be paid to the Agricultural Trust. <br />Another aspect that would have to be considered is that the <br />Concept Plan states Pleasanton would have the first opportunity <br />to process development applications within its Sphere, which <br />includes approximately 40% of the Ruby Hill site. <br /> <br />Mitigation Fees <br /> <br />The purpose of the mitigation fees is to discourage conversion of <br />cultivable land to non-agricultural use and provide a source of <br />money to fund the Agricultural Land Trust. The amount of the fees <br />is based on the amount and agricultural value of the land <br />displaced. The legal rationale for the fee is similar to that for <br />the Low Income Housing Fee recently adopted by the City. For <br />every unit built which displaces the potential for viticultural <br />use, a fee must be paid to rectify the loss of agricultural land. <br />The fee varies according to density and the usefulness of the <br />land for agriculture. For example, land in the gateway which is <br />zoned up to 4 units per acre has a fee equal to 25% of the fee <br />for land in conditionally developable land which is zoned at 1 <br />unit per acre. The basis for the fee assumes that all land <br />potentially can be converted to agricultural use, an assumption <br />verified by the viticultural experts. A premium is placed on <br />existing cultivable land to discourage loss of this resource. <br />While the Concept Plan permits up to 20% of cultivable land <br />within a particular project site to be developed as part of a <br />larger project, the fee is set at $30,000 per unit within <br /> <br />SR:91:30 <br /> <br /> -9- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.