My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 99089
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
RES 99089
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/20/2012 1:59:09 PM
Creation date
7/9/1999 5:39:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
6/22/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
f <br />"Excerpt from Planning Commission Staff Report 9/23/98 Concerning Foothill Road <br />Improvements" <br />The developer is concerned that moving the southern row of homes to the west 30 ft. <br />would potentially impact the privacy and view of the existing home in the Foothill Knolls <br />subdivision located behind Lots 10 and 11 by shifting the structure on Lot 11 so that it is <br />directly behind the Foothill Knolls lot instead of offset from it. However. if a Plan 1 <br />model.which is 15 ft. narrower than Plan lA is used on Lot 11, the net result would be <br />that the house on that lot would move only 1 ~ ft. more to the west than that shown on the <br />current plan. As a result, the existing Foothill Knolls residence would still have a vie~~~ <br />through the two new homes on Lots 10 and 11 and would not have a house directly <br />behind it. The developer has not agreed to this proposed change, believing that <br />eliminatine the lot to achieve the 30 ft. shift and large open space area may be excessive <br />and not achieve the best result. <br />The interface between the front yard on Lot 17 and the public open space is not as critical <br />an issue because the public trail stops short of the front yard of this house. A turfblock <br />access could be built in the front yard with a section of decorative fencing in the center <br />separating the public versus private areas. A condition of approval has been added <br />requiring that an all-weather surface be provided from the pedestrian trail open space area <br />to the manholes and that a section of decorative fence be installed along the center portion <br />of the front yard areas on these two lots in order to delineate the private versus public <br />area. <br />Foothill Road Improvements <br />All nevv development is required to install street improvements along its frontage, if <br />necessary. The developer of this property would be required to complete street <br />improvements along its Foothill Road frontage, as well as transitions to unimproved <br />portions of the roadway on both ends. Also, the developer has entered into a private <br />agreement with the developer of the approved Equus Court project, across Foothill Road <br />from the project site, to install both developments' required street improvements at the <br />same time in order to facilitate this project's Foothill Road entrance and to minimize <br />construction costs. The improvements which would be installed to fulfill both projects' <br />frontage improvement obligations are shown on the attached plans. These improvements <br />would include two 12 ft. travel lanes, a 12 ft. center left turn lane into both the Equus <br />Court project and this site, and landscaped parkway strips with a separated bicycle and <br />pedestrian pathway on the east side of the road. A condition of approval has been added <br />requiring the proposed plan be revised to show a meandering pathway consistent with <br />other projects in the area rather than a monolithic sidewalk as shown on the attached <br />plans. The developer has agreed to make this change. A retaining wall up to 8 ft. in <br />PUD-96-14 Page 19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.