Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Chapter 3 <br />The Environmental Review Process <br /> <br />types of golf facilities); only one use ranked lower,5 Golf, though an open space use, is <br />not a public use that is supported by the community for the Bernal Property, <br /> <br />. Residential, Measure V (citizens' initiative, November 2002; see Draft Specific Plan <br />Appendix 1) mandates the permanent retention of the Bernal Property Phase II plan- <br />ning area under ownership by the City of Pleasanton and prohibits construction of <br />housing within the 318-acre area, <br /> <br />With residential rendered legally infeasible and golf rendered politically infeasible, the key <br />differences between the phase I and Phase II plans have been eliminated, Therefore, in the <br />alternatives comparison in Chapter V, Alternative 3 is discussed narratively. <br /> <br />b. Alternative 4: No Development <br /> <br />This alternative ("existing condition") addresses the site as it currently is and serves as the <br />starting point for the environmental analysis, <br /> <br />c. Alternative Project Site <br /> <br />A different type of alternative would be the selection of a different site, <br /> <br />In this particular case, an alternative site does not represent a feasible alternative, Pleasan- <br />ton owns the land that the Phase II Specific Plan addresses, The uses proposed are, in <br />some cases, not appropriate to any other site (e,g" the Knoll open space must be at the <br />Knoll; the open space along the Arroyo de la Laguna, and particularly the Native American <br />Reflective Area, represent resources unique to the site; the sportsfields are particularly <br />suitable to the level areas on the Bernal property: etc,), <br /> <br />Therefore, no alternative site for the Bernal Property Phase II Specific Plan is evaluated, <br /> <br />d. Specific Plan Alternatives Summary <br /> <br />Table 3 (p, 30) presents a summary of the alternatives considered in this EIR, The array of <br />uses for the project and Alternatives 1 and 2 are generally similar though some uses are <br />differently assigned to sub-areas, For Alternative 3 (the Phase I Specific Plan), uses in some <br />sub-areas were left open in order to allow the Phase II plan to encompass the set of uses <br />determined by the Phase II planning process to be of community interest.6 <br /> <br />5 Bernal Property Phase II Specific Plan, Preliminary Draft of May 13, 2002 (last page): Potential Public and <br />QuaSi-Public land Uses as Prioritized by the Bernal Property Task Force. The lowest-ranking use was a <br />conference center. <br />6 The land use categories that allowed flexibility in the Phase II planning effort carried the labels Optional <br />Residential, Potential Golf Course, and Phase II - Interim Open Space. In all of these flexible categories, <br />some of the uses included in the Phase II array are public uses. While the Phase 1 1997{2000 EIR did not <br />initially envision the possibility of Pleasanton's acquiring the site for public uses, the land use categories of <br />the Phase I Specific Plan are sufficiently broad to encompass the array of uses Pleasanton proposes in the <br />Phase II Draft Specific Plan. <br /> <br />29 <br />