SR 06:101 - Laserfiche WebLink

~ Exhibit A . Camera-ready base maps to illustrate project site and project vicinity information . An inventory of cumulative projects for Pleasanton and Livermore. . Construction phasing and duration. We will conduct a site visit/orientation on the same day to give consultant team members familiarity with the site and the project sponsor's proposaL Deliverable: Preliminary SEIR outline and format recommendations. Meeting: Meeting No.1 with staff to kick off the project and visit the project study area. Task 2. Prepare Project Description, Notice of Preparation, and Scoping Purpose: To prepare a project description and NOP, and to participate in a scoping session to receive public comments on the issues to be addressed in the SEIR. Discussion: The preparation of the project description and the NOP will comply with the State CEQA Guidelines, as described below. The scoping session will be held as part of a regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting. Subtask 2.1 Project Description The project description will summarize the entitlements being sought by the project sponsor, the location and details of the proposed project, the objectives sought by the project sponsor, and the intended uses of the SEIR. Information for this section will be obtained from the project sponsor (Alameda County Surplus Property Authority) as well as the Initial Study. EIP will utilize electronic files of the preliminary plans for the SEIR. The key differences between the proposed project and the development plans originally anticipated on the 293-acre site as provided in the Stoneridge Drive Specific Plan will be described. In addition, the Stoneridge Drive Specific Plan will require an amendment to accommodate the proposed project. This amendment will be included as part of the project description. One of the most important tasks for the SEIR will be to clearly distinguish those impacts that have been addressed and mitigated in the original EIR and those that require new analyses. The Initial Study does an admirable job of making this distinction, and the same effort must apply to the SEIR. For some topics, the amendments may result in a reduction from those impacts identified in the 1989 EIR; for other topics, the incremental impacts will be greater and it will be necessary to determine how much additional mitigation, if any, is warranted. A chart clearly explaining the original entitlements, how much of that is developed, which components are changing, and what the proposed uses will be is envisioned as a technique for summarizing the differences between the original Stoneridge Drive Specific Plan and the proposed amendment. Table 2-1 below illustrates this concept and is similar to a table included in the 1996 Supplemental EIR for a residential proposal that was never implemented. EIP Associates 2-2