SR 06:056 - Laserfiche WebLink

The developer has prepared the required disclosure deeds and CC&R's. All submittals are in substantial conformance with conditions of the approved tentative map. Development fees, including the Vineyard A venue Corridor Specific Plan fee for all fourteen lots allowed within Parcel I and Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 8070, have been paid, and the signed Subdivision Agreement has been submitted. Proposed Improvements The proposed improvements closely match the conceptual planning for the site specified in the Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specific Plan. The development proposes two public streets - an extension of Vineyard Terrace constructed with Hahner Project and Silver Oaks Court. Vineyard Terrace will be extended in an easterly direction with the development of the Chrisman's property, creating a loop with Rolling Hills Lane, to be constructed with the Hahner Project. Silver Oaks Court, when extended, will serve the remaining 5 lots within Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 8070 (Hillside Residential portion of the development). Upon their acceptance, the streetlights, the storm drain systems, and the sanitary sewer and the water systems within the public streets serving this project will be maintained and operated by the City. Parcel "A" and Parcel "B" (the open space parcels) will be maintained by the Homeowners Association. The storm drainage system shown on Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 8070 will remain private and maintained by the property owner. Existing (Old) Vineyard A venue In preparing the development plans for the subdivisions along Old Vineyard A venue, it was discovered that additional right-of-way had been dedicated to Alameda County in the 1970's for the future widening of the roadway; this street widening was never completed. The street right-of-way was 50 feet before the additional dedication was made to the County. This is more than adequate for the proposed Vineyard Trail, consequently, the additional 18- foot width is not needed. The 18-foot street dedication was made in fee title to Alameda County, which then reverted to the City pursuant to California Street and Highway Code section 989. It appears that that this small portion of property has negligible value and its only logical use is for the landscaping in the development of the adjoining Berlogar Development. To allow this use of the excess right-of-way, the City will need to quitclaim its interest in the excess right-of-way to the adjoining property owner. The California Streets and Highways Code provides for an abbreviated, summary vacation procedure for public rights of way under certain conditions, including when there is excess right of way or when a street has been superseded by relocation. In this situation, not only has the excess portion of the right of way never been used as a street, but the use of a portion of the existing Vineyard Avenue as a vehicular street has been superseded by the new aligmnent of Vineyard A venue. In vacating this excess width of the existing Vineyard A venue SR 06:056 Page 3 of 4