Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. Discussion in Joint Workshops with the Planning Commission of citywide land use <br />issues and of all major "potential land use changes areas". These "change areas" are <br />areas being considered for a change in General Plan land use designation at the request <br />of the land owner or because the existing land use designation is inconsistent with the <br />current or anticipated use of the site. <br /> <br />. Consideration by City of Pleasant on commissions of several Draft Elements of the <br />General Plan, including the Energy Element, the Public Safety Element, the Public <br />Facilities and Community Programs Element, and the Economic and Fiscal Element. <br /> <br />SUMMARY OF REMAINING RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL <br /> <br />A major issue to be decided as part of the General Plan update is how to utilize the remaining <br />residential capacity under the voter-enacted residential cap of29,000 units; that is, what type <br />of units should they be and where should they be located? Currently, there are approximately <br />26,502 units existing or approved, and an additional 812 units (as calculated at mid-point <br />densities) which are unentitled, but could be developed under the existing General Plan land <br />use designations. This leaves approximately 1,686 units remaining to be planned for under <br />the residential cap of29,000 units. See Attachment I: Overview of Remaining Residential <br />Development Potential, for more detailed calculations. <br /> <br />The City Council is considering several land use issues that could have an impact on the <br />1,690 units remaining to be planned for under the cap. These include: <br /> <br />. Whether or not continuing care senior units should be counted towards the residential <br />cap. A preliminary proposal for development of the Staples Ranch area includes a <br />senior continuing care facility with over 800 units, ranging from apartment-style living <br />to skilled nursing beds. If this development is approved, and if a majority of these <br />units are counted towards the cap, there will be significantly fewer units to plan for in <br />the other potential "change areas" discussed below. <br /> <br />. The reduction of density in some steeply sloping hill areas and the transfer of <br />residential density to other sites. If the City Council adopts a policy that has the effect <br />of reducing residential density in the area west of Foothill Road and/or in the <br />southwest hills, there may be approximately 150 additional units which could be <br />located in the potential "change areas". At the last Workshop, the consensus of the <br />Council appeared not to favor the imposition of density restrictions in the West <br />Foothill Road area. <br /> <br />SR 06:090 <br />Page 2 of6 <br />