Laserfiche WebLink
Goals and Transportation Service Objectives <br /> <br /> · Pla~ng conditions on project approvals consistent with Action plnn policies <br /> (e.g., requiring payment of fees or participation in the TSM/TDM progrnm). <br /> · Circulation of environmental docH ments as specified in Action Plnn~. <br /> · Submission to Regional Committee of proposed revision(s) to Action Plan to <br /> mitigate impacts associated with proposed General Plan ~menrlments. General <br /> Plan nmendments that would reduce the effectiveness of adopted Action Plans <br /> may lead to a determination of non-compliance if the Action Plan c~qnnot be <br /> revised with the approval of the Regional Committee and the CCTA (for Contra <br /> Costa County jurisdictions). _ <br /> · Participation in Regional Mitigation program~ developed by the CCTA (for Contra <br /> Costa County jurisdictions). <br /> <br /> Preliminary TSOs were presented to the Tri-Valley Transportation Council (TVTC) in <br /> February 1993. After discussion and subsequent moclH~ication, the TSOs were approved <br /> by the TVTC in March 1993. The following list presents the approved TSOs. One or <br /> more will be applied to each regional route, different routes may have different TS0s. <br /> <br /> .Link Levels of Service (LOS). Maintain LOS no worse than E (V/C = 0.99) on freeways <br /> and r~mps during the peak hours based on traffic counts. This represents a very busy <br /> condition, with speeds about 35 mph on freeways. This standard is sometimes not met <br /> under today's traffic conditions. For freeways, this corresponds to the existing CMP <br /> standards. For arterials, the LOS stan~rd is D on a ]~nl~ basis. These are also subject <br /> to an intersection LOS standard. <br /> <br /> Hours of CongeStion. Maintn~n LOS E conditions on 1-580 for no more than two hours <br /> in the morning and two hours in the afternoon, except over Altnmont Pass, where no <br /> TSO has been adopted. LOS E on 1-680 for no more than four hours in the morning <br /> and four hours in the evening. Given the gateway constr_n~nts discussed in Chapter 5, <br /> this is the best the plan can achieve. <br /> <br /> Intersection Levels of Service. Maintain LOS no worse than D (V/C = 0.90) for signal- <br /> ized intersections during peak hours where the standard is now being met. Achieve <br /> LOS D by 2010 at locations not currently in compliance. The methodology is the VCCC <br /> program, which is based on critical movement analysis, with adjustments to raw <br /> model output turning movements. This is the standard to which all Tri-Valley <br /> jurisdictions presently adhere. Under current conditions, only three of the study <br /> intersections violate this standard. <br /> <br /> Tri-Vctlley Gateways. 1-580, 1-680, and Crow Canyon Road (Castro Valley to San <br /> Ramon) and Vasco Road (north of Liverraore). Maintain existing capacity for single- <br /> occupant passenger vehicles. Widening of gateways would cause the Tri-Valley area to <br /> be negatively affected by interregional traffic. (See Chapter 7 for a complete discussion <br /> of this issue.) <br /> <br />Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. 39 <br /> <br /> <br />