Laserfiche WebLink
Contents (Continued) <br /> <br /> Figures Page - <br /> <br /> 2-1 Existing Lane Configurations 12 -- <br /> ~--2 Existing Daily Traffic Volumes <br /> 2-3 Existing Congested Locations 23 <br /> 2-4 Existing Bikeways 30 <br /> 2-5 Proposed Bikeways <br /> 2-6 Tri-Valley 1990 PM Peak-Hour Trip Characteristics 37 <br /> 4-1 Baseline Assumed Road Network Changes 48 <br /> 4-2 2010 Daily Traffic Volumes--Baseline Forecasts 51 ' <br /> 4-3 Baseline Forecast Year 2010 Peak-Hour Overcapacity Links 53 <br /> 44 2010 Total Trips by Type (PM Peak Hour) 60 <br /> 5-1 Expected Transportation Network 71 <br /> 5-2 Year 2010 Expected Forecast PM Peak Hour Traffic Demand <br /> (No Gateway Constraint) 74 <br /> 5-3 Example of Gateway Peak-Spreading 76 <br /> 54 Year 2010 Expected Forecast PM Peak-Hour Traffic Demand ' <br /> (No Gateway Constraint) 78 <br /> 5-5 Year 2010 Peak-Hour Overcapacity Roadways <br /> with Gateway Constraint 80 ' <br /> 5-6 Expected Network--Interchange Configurations 83 <br /> 5-7 Expected Network--Interchange Configuration 93 <br /> 6-1 Maximum Highway Network--Changes From Baseline Network 105 '-- <br /> 6-2 Cong~sted Roadways With Maximum Highway Alternative 108 <br /> 6-3 Maximum Transit Alternative--Priority Express Bus Network 110 <br /> 6-4 Maximum Transit Altemative--Intercity/Commuter Rail 111 <br /> 6-5 Congested Roadways With Maximum Transit Alternative 113 <br /> 6-6 Congested Roadways With Zero Growth Land Use Alternative 117 <br /> 7-1 Planned Transportation Network 134 <br /> <br /> Exhibits _ <br /> <br /> 1 Projections '92 Forecast for Year 2010 Households and Employment in <br /> Tri-Valley Jurisdictions, Compared to CCTA LUIS and -- <br /> ABAG Projections '90 Forecasts 44 <br /> 2 Contra Costa County Resolution r.e. Tri-Valley Plan 174 <br /> <br /> 394-TI P/651193.90100 <br /> <br /> <br />