Laserfiche WebLink
EXHIBIT.q <br /> <br /> STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS <br /> <br />- Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act CCEQA") Guideline Section 15093, <br /> the City Council of the City &Pleasanton adopts and makes the following Statement of <br /> Overriding Considerations regarding unavoidable environmental impacts of the Happy Valley <br /> Specific Plan project ("Project") and the anticipated social, economic and other benefits of the <br /> Project. <br /> <br /> The City Council finds and determines, based on the evidence set forth in the Draft EIR <br /> and Final EIR Chapters 3 and 5, as well as the evidence set forth below, that to the extent that any <br /> significant environmental impacts (e.g. conversion of agricultural land to urban uses; and exposure <br /> of structures and persons to injuries and death from seismic events) attributable to the Project <br /> remain unmitigated, the benefits of the Specific Plan Project outweigh such unavoidable adverse <br /> environmental effects relating to the conversion of agricultural land to urban use, and the <br /> exposure of structures and populations to risk of injury and death from seismic activity. <br /> <br /> In addition, the City Council finds and deterrmnes that the measures suggested by the <br /> Draft EIR to reduce the cumulative regional impacts (e.g. conversion of agricultural land to urban <br /> uses; traffic volumes on 1-580 and 1-680 which exceed adopted standards; need to expand <br /> available water supply resources; need to expand wastewater treatment capaciW; need to expand <br /> wastewater export capacity; and exposure of portions of the fire service area to response times <br /> exceeding 5 minutes) cannot be implemented in the absence of regional solutions, or are the <br /> responsibility of one or more other public entities. <br /> <br /> The City Council also finds and determines that the Project Alternatives ("Alternatives"), <br /> as set forth in Chapter 4 of the Draft EIR, are unfeasible and/or less desirable than the Project <br /> itself. Such Alternatives would create undesirable impacts (e.g. noise and traffic) on existing <br /> residential development, as well as additional significant environmental impacts. The City Council <br /> finds that the Alternatives would preclude obtaining specific social, economic and other benefits <br /> of the Project. Specifically, the City Council finds and determines that the following social, <br /> economic and other considerations warrant approval of the Project, notwithstanding any <br /> unavoidable or unmitigated project level, or regional cumulative impacts, resulting from the <br /> Project: <br /> <br /> A. Recreation and Community Activity. The City Council finds and determines that <br /> the Project provides for well-planned recreational amenities, such as the municipal golf course, <br /> local and regional trails, and open space which meet the needs of the City and the region, while <br /> maintaining environmental quality. The Project provides social benefits to those residing in the <br /> City and those choosing to reside in the City in the future by providing areas for outdoor <br /> recreation available to all members of the public. In the General Plan, the City Council adopted <br /> policies to enhance recreational opportunities and promote the development of a municipal golf <br /> course. (See 1996 General Plan, Public Facilities Chapter, Policies 13 and 14.). In addition, open <br /> <br /> Exhibit B 1 <br /> <br /> <br />