My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 111605
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
PC 111605
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 3:22:30 PM
Creation date
3/9/2006 1:56:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
11/16/2005
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 111605
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Lynn Jansen, applicant, P.O. Box 417, Llliablo, CA 945273, noted that he had owned the property <br />for 1 1 years and that ha was also the owner of Lyndon Homes, acting as his own de.veloper_ He <br />detailed the background of this project and displayed the site plan, describing the existing <br />driveway of the adjacent Tones property. He noted that Mr. Ernie Jones presented ten criteria he <br />was looking for at their 2003 meeting: to retain his existing entrance point; to improve the <br />gravel/dirt road; to bring rriodern utilities to that point from Rose Avenue; to fill in the chamieled <br />low spot with either a staining wall, or filling it up to the highest of the existing areas; replacing <br />any driveway and landscaping that would be lost as a result of filling the channel in; raising the <br />automatic gate; and reinstalling the automatic systems- He noted that constituted their agreement <br />sinec th cn, and they had mat more thasi 24 times sinec then, bringing in surveyors, engineers, and <br />Public Works specialists, as well as Planning Department stall. He noted that a Specific Plan <br />had been put together and added that Mr. Jones' conditions were acceptable to hire; he added <br />that Mr. Jones' conditions were part of a contract that he was obligated to fulfill- <br />In response to an inquiry by Chairperson Maas regarding the cause of the explosion several <br />months prior, Mr. Jansen replied that there were two rental residences on the property and <br />displayed their location on the site plan- He noted that a contractor rented one of the houses, <br />who had sent a worker to the shed to weld a tool used in a concrete pour. "fhe employee did. the <br />welding, le Lt the site, and a spark occurred that caught the grass on fire. `fhe resulting explosions <br />were Si-om the adjacent propane tanks from the barbecue and the acetylene tanks used for <br />welding; this information was conf3n-ned by the Pire Department. He noted that any speculation <br />about nefarious activities was wzfowzded. Regarding environmental issues, he noted that when <br />the property is graded, there was a process followed that involved bringing in certilied <br />environmental inspection con panics that would look for asbestos and any other type of <br />environmental materials in the homes- He noted that the soils engineers had also performed a <br />pre-inspection and a historical inspection and analysis, as well as examined records to detenrtinc <br />if there were any history or evidence of any problems regarding environirtental n~aterials_ <br />Nothing of that nature was found, as documented in the report. <br />Mr. Jansen noted that in addition Lo the research regarding the precedents set at Nolan Farms and <br />Calico Lane, the street widths, setbacks, roof heights, density and lot sizes, they would match or <br />better the ratios of two-story homes- Thcy had already lowered roof heights, eliminated <br />windows for their two-story rears for privacy; the two-story homes now have one single <br />second-floor window in one two-story unit, and two windows in a.iiothcr_ He had no oL~jection to <br />a design review for the custon-i lot_ <br />Dave Jones, 392 Church Street, Livermore, noted that his father owned the adjacent property to <br />the proposed development. IIc noted that his father's attorney asked him to read the following <br />statement into the record: <br />"The proposed dcvclopm cnt, which is now before you, is not ready for your <br />consideration tonight. This project now proposed squires my father's legal <br />content for the realignment of access. My father has not given his knowing legal <br />con sent- Our legal co un sal has advised us that the signature of my father to the <br />consent was obtained illegally and is not enforceable. Without arty father's <br />- consent, Mr. Jansen must redesign his proposal because it does riot work without <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES November 1 6, 2005 Page 5 of 23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.