Laserfiche WebLink
._ Mr. Pavan noted that froara his personal experience during Umes of high parking deiriaiid at Jack <br />London Square, the t-ivc-level parking structure across from the Cinema had statt~ on every level <br />with two-way radios reporting the parking availability. With respect to wiring in detector loops, <br />he noted in the manner of making the deck ready for photovoltaics with conduit and pull strings, <br />the applicant could consider putting the conduits and pull strings, facil itating future retrofitting <br />for indicator devices. <br />Cornrnissioner Fox would support the initial use of a sign stating whether the garage was full. <br />Chairperson Maas believed the entrance of Macy's ladies' shoe department needed planters to <br />look more appropriate. Mr. Kudlo noted that his company did not own that property, and <br />Macy's did have entitlements For future expansion. IF and when they choose to expand, that <br />situation ~r~ay be rcetil3ed. Chairperson Maas suggested the addition of irrigation and soarae <br />benches. Mr. Kudlo would talk with Macy's about it but could not commit to a positive result. <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Blank regarding an upgraded seating plan and a WiFi <br />installation. Mr. Kudlo stated that he could commit to the upgraded seating plan- With respect to <br />the WiFi installation, their research has not yet revealed many carriers that would be willing to <br />do that. <br />Coiriiriissioncr Blank suggastad presenting the mall as a beta site to provide a proof of cottcept <br />before a pcnrtancnt installation could be approved. <br />-- In response to an inquiry by Cotrtniissioner Arkin regarding the response to Larry C'annon's <br />input, Steve Loken~ , sea~ior design director, noted. that they had. worked with Mr. Cannon <br />throughout the entire process, who had made several good suggestions, including offsetting the <br />trellis. Each project is run through several di FFcrcnt filters, including aesthetics, security, <br />maintainability, user friendliness; not all ideas can withstand the number of t3lters they are <br />exposed to. <br />Con~n-tissioner Fox liked the suggestion of including a fountain element, which would combine <br />well with Commissioner Blank's comments regarding pedestrian seating. <br />Mr. Lokem noted that Fowitains located in rerr,ote locations such as a parking garage posed a <br />trc~ricndous liability For them. IIc noted that children can drow» in less than two inches of water <br />and added that any feature meant to hold water can become riskier if a drain plugged up. He <br />noted that they would rather not pursue that feature for safety reasons. <br />Clint Kendall, Nordstrom, noted that there was a store with a fountain element that was added by <br />their choice. It has been shut down by the city due to water restrictions and evaporation. He <br />added that it was contrary to the LEED program and that it was not a critical area to have water. <br />He noted that an empty fountain is not attractive, and while he agreed that a functioning fountain <br />was attractive, he agreed with the maintenance and risk issues- He did not believe it was worth <br />the effort and expense they put into it. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES November 1 F, 2005 Page 1 8 of 23 <br />