PC 102605 - Laserfiche WebLink

Ms. Decker noted that she was unaware of any noise impacts when it was retracted and added that the applicant indicated that it was not always fully open- With respect to Commissioner Blank's question regarding setbacks, she noted that the standards shown on page 3 of the staff report allowed a zero setback on one side and greater than or equal to three feet on the other side- Cotntnissioncr Pcarcc believed that the HOA relied on the PUD to melee its determination, and believed that the Cornniission was obligated to clarify it. Cornn~is stoner Blank believed that the homeowners had an obligation to be aware of the CCBcRs, which the HOA was obligated to enforce. He added that there was do entitlement to view and believed that this patio cover coming up to the zero lot line was more than a view obstruction. He added that shading, wind patterns, and rain coverage would all be affected by the placement. He was very concerned that based on the testimony, all of the covers, awnings, and eaves in the development appeared to be open. He believed. the request should. be denied~ Commissioner Fox noted that she would support staff's recommendation on this request and added that this was comparable to three umbrellas placed next to one another. She preferred the aesthetics of the patio cover to several umbrellas- She added that Gingerbread Preschool had a detached patio cover on its playground to protect the children from the sun_ Acting Chairperson Arkin noted that he would support the motion to deny but believed that this should not be addressed by the Planning Commission. He was uncomfortable making a custom development standard for one lot in. a PUD. C:o mtrtissioner Pearce could see the point of a patio cover versus a latticed deck and did not believe a solid green structure was not originally intended.; she would support the tnotion_ She could also sea a benefit to anicnding a PUD, even in one sped tic instance, to provide direction to the community as a whole as to what was originally intended. Corrttriissioner Blank suggested discussing this further during Matters Initiated by Commission Members. Commissioner Blank moved to deny PUD-85-O1-4M_ Commissioner Koberts seconded the motion- ROLL GALL VOTE= AYES: Cotrttrtissioners Arkin, Blank, Pearce, acid Roberts. NOES: Commissioner Fox. ABSTAIN: None_ I2ECUSED: None_ ABSENT: Commissioner Maas_ PI.ANNTNCi COMMISSION MINUTES October 26, 2005 Page 6 of 14