My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 071305
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
PC 071305
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 3:21:22 PM
Creation date
3/9/2006 9:34:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
7/13/2005
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 071305
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
In response to an inquiry by Chairperson Maas regarding dust control, Mr. Alexander <br />noted that Condition No. 14 addressed dust control <br />THE PUBLIC: HEARING WAS CLOSED~ <br />Commissioner Roberts moved to make the conditional use permit findings as listed <br />in the staff report and to approve PCUP-145, subject to the conditions of approval <br />listed in Exhibit B of the staff report, as recommended by staft~ with the <br />modification that Condition No_ 7 be modified to delete the requirement for a cash <br />bond for the trees and that the trees be protected by a chain-link fence instead~ <br />Commissioner Arkin seconded the motion~ <br />ROLL CALL VOTF_o <br />AYES= Commissioners Arkin, Pox, Maas, Pearce.-, and Roberts_ <br />NOES: None. <br />ABSTAIN: None_ <br />RECLJSED: None_ <br />ABSENT= Commissioner Blank_ <br />Resolution No_ PC-2005-32 was entered and adopted as motioned~ <br />d_ PDR-466/PUD-OI-8M, Brant R_ Daoust. Daoust Development <br />Application for design review approval to construct an approxirnatcly <br />4, 1 00-square-foot single-family custom home at 2503 Vineyard Avenue in the <br />Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specific Plan Area, and for a minor modification to an <br />approved development plan to iriodify the development standards to reduce the <br />required 25-foot rear yard setback to 15 feet- Zoning for the property is <br />PLJD-LDR Planned L.Tnit Development -Low Density Residential) District~ <br />Ms_ Decker summarized the staff report and noted that this was typically processed as a <br />minor n-iodi fication on the staff level- In this case, however, the PUD conditions of <br />approval required that any modification be a major modification- She noted that it would <br />be the Plarttiing Commission's choice how it would be handled- She described the <br />history and layout of this project. She displayed Lhe various growth intervals of the trees <br />and noted that the substantial planting would provide visual relief of the retaining wall <br />She corrected the language in the staff report that described Lhe use of stucco. Staff <br />recommended approval of this item and added that both modification choices were <br />acceptable to staff <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. <br />Brant A_ Daoust, applicant, requested that the Planning Conm-iission support the minor <br />modification due to the placement of the high-voltage line that would not be moved <br />underground. He then inquired whether Co~rtiriissioner Roberts would be amenable to <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES July 13, 2005 Page 1 1 of 1 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.