Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Arkin believed that the Council voted on this issue. <br />Commissioner Fox noted that she was surprised that the issue was brought up again at the <br />previous night's Workshop. <br />Commissioner Arkin recalled that with respect to the 1 996 General Plan, Jennifer <br />Hosterman stated that she would like to have a hearing, a consensus was reached, a <br />hearing was held shortly thereafter, and the Council voted to remove the interchange. <br />Commissioner Fox believed that was also discussed in April 2003. <br />Commissioner Roberts believed that a memo to the Council from the Planning <br />Commission requesting that it state at the beginning of workshops that a particular item <br />has been removed. <br />Commissioner Blank moved that the Planning Commission draft a memo citing the <br />City Council's previous formal vote to remove the West Las Positas Boulevard <br />interchange from the General Plan_ <br />Commissioner Roberts seconded the motion. <br />Ms. Nerland noted. that a formal vote could not be taken because this item was not <br />agendized. She suggested that staff draft a memo to the City Council in response to <br />questions raised at the Planning Commission. <br />Commissioner Arkin requested that staff research this issue and present the information <br />at the next meeting. <br />Commissioner Fox noted that a joint workshop had taken place during which City <br />Council directed staff to take it out of the traffic model. She noted that the intersection <br />still showed up on traffic documents as if that decision had not taken place. <br />Chairperson Maas noted that the next joint General Plan review workshop would be held <br />on January 25, 2005 and that the next Planning Commission meeting would. be <br />January 26, 2005. <br />Commissioner Arkin requested that either the memo or a copy of the resolution be <br />available be Fore the January 25, 2005 meeting. <br />Ms. Nerland advised that staff would research the actions of the City Council regarding <br />the interchange and would draft a memo stating the Commission's concern that the <br />interchange still showed in the traffic model. 'i'he memo would also state that the <br />Commission would also like that item formally agendized for the next meeting. <br />Commissioner Blank suggested that this issue be agendized for the next Planning <br />__._. CJommission meeting. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES January 12, 2005 Page 19 of 21 <br />