My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 011205
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
PC 011205
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 2:57:48 PM
Creation date
3/9/2006 8:31:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
1/12/2005
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 011205
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Blank inquired whether there was a City representative at the <br />December 20 meeting. Ms. Nerland replied that she was not sure and that staff may have <br />known that the item would have been continued because of County staffing conflicts over <br />the holidays. Commissioner Blank would like to see a City staff member present at the <br />continued County Planning Commission meeting. <br />Chairperson Maas noted that there was Commission consensus for C=ity representation at <br />meeting. <br />Joint Citv Council-Planning Commission Workshop of January 1 1 _ 2005 <br />Commissioner Blank wished to discuss the Joint City Council-Planning Commission <br />Workshop the previous evening and noted that there seemed to be some confusion with <br />the process. He believed the process could be clarified in the form of the Planning <br />Commission agendizing an item to hold a public hearing on the elimination of the West <br />Las Positas Boulevard interchange from all planning documents and from the General <br />Plan. He believed that would give the public an opportunity to comment on that one <br />spedfic issue. He did not sense much support at the Planning Commission or Council <br />levels for the interchange's inclusion in the General Plan. He noted that he had not heard <br />from any member of the general public supporting that plan as well. He inquired whether <br />his fellow Commissioners would support agendizing an item to hold a public hearing. <br />""- Commissioner Roberts noted that the Council voted that item out and noted that it was a <br />confusing portion of the Workshop. <br />Chairperson Maas noted that the Council stated it would not support that item. She <br />believed that before a public hearing were to be contemplated; the status of the item <br />should be determined. <br />Ms. Nerland replied that it would be best to ask the project planners the question <br />regarding the status. <br />Commissioner Roberts noted that they had discussed the 1996 General Plan and that the <br />interchange was in that General Plan_ The next meeting was to discuss extensions and <br />the West Las Positas Boulevard interchange and that the issue was already decided- <br />Commissioner Blank inquired whether there was a formal resolution with a vote on this <br />issue in the past, and iF not, he would like to see that action formalized. <br />Chairperson Maas suggested a formal communication be drawn up to Council inquiring <br />why the interchange was still being discussed- She suggested respectfully asking the <br />Council to clarify its stance. <br />Commissioner Blank believed that asking For clari {icaiion did not carry the same weight <br />.-- and finality as voting. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES January 12, 2005 Page 18 of 21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.