My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 06:054
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2006
>
SR 06:054
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/2/2006 3:43:47 PM
Creation date
2/2/2006 3:29:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
2/7/2006
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 06:054
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council: <br /> <br />BACKGROUND <br /> <br />On May 17,2005, the City Council approved an agreement with Lifetime Tennis, Inc. to manage <br />tennis operations at Tennis and Community Park. In addition, the Council considered several <br />options proposed by the City/School District Liaison Committee regarding alternatives to <br />increase available court space. This was in response to inquires made at a number of public <br />meetings about the potential for additional tennis courts on the Bernal Property, and a perceived <br />lack of adequate lighted tennis courts. The Council requested that the Parks and Recreation <br />Commission review and provide recommendations regarding the potential lighting of the two (2) <br />tennis courts at Pleasanton Middle School (PMS), and implementation of an "on demand" court <br />reservation system at the high school courts during times when other courts are unavailable. <br /> <br />The Commission considered this matter at its regularly scheduled meeting on July 14, 2005. <br />Staff researched initial cost estimates for installing lights at PMS, including the potential <br />upgrading of the court surface consistent with the quality at Tennis and Community Park. The <br />estimated cost for a lighting system was $51,000, and $41,000 for court upgrades, a total of <br />approximately $92,000. Prior to investing in such a large capital improvement, however, the <br />Commission supported the collecting of data regarding the number of players impacted by a lack <br />of available courts (particularly lighted) at Tennis and Community Park. The Commission <br />requested that the review be conducted for three (3) months (July 15 - October 2005), with staff <br />reporting the findings at the November 2005 meeting. It was also recommended that, if the City <br />were to install lights, consideration be given to a coin-operated system. This would be <br />consistent with the current practice at other lighted facilities (Upper Bernal Field, Tennis and <br />Community Park; Softball Complex), where users pay fees for the use of lights. <br /> <br />Attached for the Council's review (Attachment 1) are the results of the court availability data <br />collected from July 15 through October 15. During this period (102 days), a total of 393 players <br />were unable to access a court, as requested, at Tennis and Community Park. This represents an <br />average of 3.3 players per day, although the most impacted periods were Monday-Friday <br />evenings (7:00-9:00 PM), and Saturday mornings (9:00 AM-12:00 Noon). These periods are <br />generally the prime time for leagues and group lessons, and the designated drop-in courts are <br />typically in high demand. Of the approximately 80 times that players were impacted during <br />evening play, 37% were required to wait '12 hour; 42% up to 1 hour; and 21 % 1 Y2 hours (or no <br />court was available). There were 30 instances during daylight hours when courts were not <br />available, but it is unclear whether players were willing to utilize courts at PMS, Fairlands Park, <br />Muirwood Park, or the "on demand" system implemented through the high schools. <br /> <br />An average of 3.3 players turned away at a public tennis facility with ten (10) courts and open <br />over 12 hours per day does not represent an excessive number. What is not reflected, however, <br /> <br />SR 06:054 <br />Page 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.