Laserfiche WebLink
<br />The a'Wning ~as originally mounted such that it crossed the side property lineo This situation has <br />since been remediedo <br /> <br />DISCUSSION <br /> <br />Staff believes the PUO modification to allo'W the retractable a~ning is supportableo <br />Mr. Fischer's a~ning serves as a shade covelO for the patio located in his rear yard (see <br />photograph belo~)o I I' c1assi fied as a "patio cover" instead of an a~ning, the applicant's <br />retractable a~ning ~ould adhere to the setback and height requirelnents required for patio <br />covers in the PUO. The Planning COlnrnission and a re~ neighbors still have concerns, and <br />these are addressed in the Planning Commission and Public Conunent sections belo'Wo For the <br />Council's infonnation, the attached Planning Comlnission staff report includes a detailed site <br />description and a discussion about the site develoPlnent standards of the PUOo <br /> <br /> <br />A'Wning Fully Extended at 1576 Poppybank Court <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> <br />On October 26, 2005, the Planning COlnlnission revie'Wed the proposed project. By a 4 to I <br />vote, the Planning COlnmission recomlnended denial of the proposed PUr::> modification to al1o~ <br /> <br />SR 06:020 <br />Page 3 of6 <br />