SR 06:020 - Laserfiche WebLink

the retractable canvas awning, The Planning Conunission expressed the following reasons for the denial: >- The awning is too close to the neighboring property lineo StaffCo/lunent: The cHvning has a zero-foot side yard setback. A zero--.Joot side yard setback on one side property line is allowedfor patio covers in the PUDo >- The a~ning ~ill impact shading, ~ind pattems, and rain coverage on the neighboring property 0 Staff cOlnlnent: Due to the slope, location, and retractable design of the awning, stafffinds it unlikely that the proposed canvas awning would have nlore of a shading, wind, and rain inlpact on the neighboring property than another type of patio cover which is allowed per the PUD, such as a non- retractable wood patio cover in the saIne location and at the saIne heighto >- The a~ning is a vie~ obstrllctiono Staff Co 111 111 en t: The awning is visiblefr0111 the neighbor's rear yard >- The a~ning is too large for a small backyard. Staff COln111ent: The a"Wning is approxi111ately 100 square feet in size and the rear yard is approxi111ately 1,772 squarefeet in sizeo >- The HOA has only approved lattice (open) type patio covers, and the proposed cover is solido The one Planning Commissioner in support of the a~ning stated that it is similar to three canvas umbrellas placed next to one another and that she preferred the aesthetics of the patio cover to several umbrellaso Public comments are addressed in the section belo~o The October 26,2005 Planning COlnlnission meeting lninutes are attached for the Council's information (see Exhibit 1)0 PUBLIC COMMENTS Notice of this application ~as sent to all property owners living within 1,000 feet or the subject propertyo At the time this staff report was written, staffhad received the fol1o~ing comments about the proposal: SR 06:020 Page 4 or6