My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 070903
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
PC 070903
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2017 9:41:06 AM
Creation date
12/8/2005 10:14:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
7/9/2003
DOCUMENT NAME
PC-070903
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
homeowners, rather than GEHAD; the actual landslide repairs would be the responsibility <br />of GEHAD- <br />Commissioner Roberts advised that the February 4, 2002, Supplemental <br />Recommendations Regarding Setback Limits stated, "It should be noted that it is the <br />responsibility of the owner or his representative to notify Terrasearch in writing a <br />ariinimurn of two working days before any clearing, grading, or To undati oar excavations <br />can commence at the site" She inquired. whether that would still be part of the <br />conditions- <br />Mr- Swift advised that as part of the geotechnical requirements, it would be part of the <br />conditions- <br />A discussion of the definition of recent and ancient landslides cnsucd- <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED_ <br />Patrick Currin, 5045 Hillerest Way, applicant, noted that deed restrictions, conditions of <br />approval, CCBcRs, and design guidelines would be available to a prospective purchaser- <br />He believed the design guidelines were the most important item, because the building <br />envelopes are influenced by all the considerations. <br />In response to an inquiry by Chairperson Arkin, it was noted that the GEHAD would be <br />disclosed well before the close of escrow_ Generally, a review period of three weeks for <br />complex reports would be available after the deposit was paid. <br />In response to an inquiry by Chairperson Arkin, Mr_ Swift advised that staff worked with <br />the applicant with respect to disclosures_ The City Attorney's office would review the <br />disclosures to assure that they were in accordance to the conditions of approval before a <br />final snap was recorded- <br />Commissioner Roberts noted that GEHADs ware common, and noted that they were <br />prominent assessmettts that were impossible to slip past a potential buyer. <br />Commissioner Kaaricny noted that Condition 23 stated, "The applicant will provide all <br />b uycrs with copies of the project conditions of approval and design guidelines-" In <br />response to Commissioner Kameny's inquiry regarding the timing of that action, Mr_ <br />Currin replied that occurred upon receipt of the deposit, and that he would give them at <br />least 21 days- <br />Mr. Currin noted that with respect to the second story window condition, the Borchers <br />owned the vacant lot directly across front L.ot ] , where the barn is located. He noted that <br />he had a good relationship with them, and that they were trying to sell this lot- They <br />would like to build on the lot if their fi»ancial situation changed; their preliminary design <br />was very open towards the front western side of the lots- They had expressed concern that <br />would lose privacy in their courtyard by facing a looming two-story house. llc noted that <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Tuly 9, 2003 Page 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.