PC 062503 - Laserfiche WebLink

2_ APPKO VAL OF MINUTES a. June 11, 2003. Coninzissioner Maas advised. that page 2, paragraph 13, should be changed to read, "Commissioner Maas advised that the extra time would allow the parties involved in Item 6.e. to come to an agreement, speczfzcalZy regarding the well rights. " The minutes were approved as amended. 3_ MEETING OPEN FOR ANY MEMBER OF THE AUDIENCE TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON ANY ITEM WHICH IS NOT ALREADY ON THE AGENDA_ Chairperson Arkin noted that several speaker cards had been received with respect to Item 6_b_, and that any comments regarding California Splash that did not pertain to the General Plan Amendment and the rezoning may be addressed by public comment under this portion of the agenda_ Mr. Steve Wehrlie, 6180 Stoneridge Mall, Masses, noted that he intended to speak with Marion Pavan regarding this issue. He noted that during the teen dances at Masses, he had experienced problems with students who did not bring a student ID, but were dropped off by their parents_ He noted that some youths are dropped off down the block, and that when they were not able to enter the club, that presented a problem for the teens and their parents. He noted that some kids brought their yearbooks as identification, which he cannot continue to accept as identitcation. He noted that a valid driver license would be acceptable, but the younger teens would not have a license. Ms. Nerland advised that because this item was not agendized, the Commission could not take formal action on it. She suggested that the Commission direct staff to work with Mr. Wehrlie to smooth out the mechanics of this process. She suggested that adding signs in the parking lot, clarifying the identification requirements, would be helpful. Mr. James Palmer, 3880 Stratford Court, requested the results of the sound tests at California Splash. He noted that from looking at the renderings, California Splash would be an improvement over the quarry. Mr. Frank Doljack, 750 Montevino Drive, expressed concern about a substantial amount of traffic generated during California Splash's operating hours. He noted that if only Pleasanton residents visited California Splash, it would not be economical, and added that outside traffic would intensify congestion to city streets. He expressed concern about noise from loudspeakers, and believed that the residents of the mobile home parks and Shadow Cliffs would be most affected. He did not believe; the plywood or Plexiglas sound barriers would be effective, and that concrete may be necessary. He did not feel that this would be a good project. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES June 25, 2003 Page 5