PC 052803 - Laserfiche WebLink

neighboring homes- He believed there was flexibility for ground door expansion, given the existing setbacks. Commissioner Sedlak noted that the elevations were not only a matter of balancing the surrounding neighborhood, but also of taste, which was a difficult subjective judgment to make- He noted that a computer rendering of the addition would give a good indication of the scale and the potential sltadowing_ He suggested that the applicant revisit how the f3na1 elevation would look on the property, and possibly make the accommodation of lowering with the roofline with the addition of a split level. He noted that the stability problems may preclude moving any earth- Chair Arkin concurred with the other Commissioners, and believed that while second- story additions were desirable when possible, the proposed design was out of character with the neighborhood- G'ommissioner Roberts moved to deny PADR-776 due to the inappropriate relationship to proposed building site and adjoining areas, and its inconsistency with the neighborhood character- Commissioner Sullivan seconded the motion. ROLL CALL VOTE AYES: Commissioners Arkin, Kemeny, Maas, Roberts, and Sullivan NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None Resolution No. PC-2003-18 was entered and adopted as nzotioned_ b_ PGPA-7 PRZ-15 PCUP-63 and PDR-243 Glenn Kierstead G'alifo rnia Splash LLC Applications for: 1.J General Plan amendment to change the land use designation for the approximately 10.7 acre parcel at 3320 Stanley Boulevard from Retail/Highway/Service Commercial, Business and Professional Offices to Parks and Recreation; 2.J rezoning an approximately 10.7 acre parcel at 3320 Stanley Boulevard from Service Commercial <C-S) District to Public and Institutional ~P) District or any other zoning district deemed in the public interest:, and 3.J conditional use permit and design review approvals io expand the existing water park facilities and related improvements at Shadow Cliffs Regional Recreation Area, 2500 and 3320 Stanley Boulevard. The Planning Commission will also consider the negative declaration prepared for the project. Mr. Iserson summarized the staff report- He detailed the history of the site and its development. He advised that a work session on this application was held in September 2002_ At that time, the Commission. expressed general support For the proposal, and wanted to ensure that issues of traft3c, parking, views, colors, trees, and noise were properly addressed. Staff worked with the applicant with respect to those issues, as PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES May 28, 2003 Page 6