My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 051403
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
PC 051403
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2017 9:40:32 AM
Creation date
12/8/2005 10:08:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
5/14/2003
DOCUMENT NAME
PC-051403
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr_ Iserson advised that this item could be added to the agenda for May 28, 2003, and <br />that staff would provide a report to the Commissioners as soon as possible_ <br />Commissioner Sullivan moved to agendize the Lake I matter for the meeting of <br />May 28, 2003_ <br />Commissioner Roberts seconded the motion_ <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br />AYES: Commissioners Arkin, Kameny, Maas, Roberts, and Sullivan <br />NOES= None <br />ABS"I'ALN= None <br />ABSENT= None <br />The motion carried_ <br />Chair Arkin suggested that the remainder of Matters Initiated be addressed after the <br />Public Hearings_ <br />S_ MATTERS CONTINUED FOR DECISION <br />There were none_ <br />6. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND OTHER MATTERS <br />a_ PCUP-82_ Sharon Carrell <br />Application for a conditional use permit a ladies workout facility in an existing <br />building in the Oakhills Shopping Center located at 5424 Sunol Boulevard, #4_ <br />Zoning for the property is Neighborhood Commercial (C-NJ District_ <br />Jerry Iserson presented the staff report_ Staff believed that parking for this use would <br />be sufficient, and that there would be no noise or parking impacts on the surrounding <br />businesses and residents. <br />Staff believed that the use would offer a service to residents of the neighborhood, <br />would be compatible with the surrounding businesses, and would not be a detriment <br />to surrounding properties_ Staff noisd that the conditional use findings could be made, <br />and recommended approval of this item subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit B. <br />Zn response to an inquiry by Commissioner Maas with respect to any change in noise <br />impacts on the rear neighbors, Mr_ Iserson noted that there would be a very marginal <br />increase in the number of cars parked to the rear of the building_ Staff did not believe <br />there would be much of an impact, and that the customers arrived at staggered hours <br />during the day_ In addition, the sound wall would mitigate the noise, and staff did not <br />believe there would be any concern to the neighbors_ He noted that the neighbors had <br />a complaint mechanism if it were to become necessary_ <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED_ <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES May 14, 2003 Page 4 <br />_ T. _.. -. T... __~_ _. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.