PC 021203 - Laserfiche WebLink

the meetings and keep the City updated regarding their plans; at this point, they plarlrted to continue worlcing_ They believed that the original Bay Area Selt=Storage application was a good fix for their property, and noted that they buffered the Kie-Wit property with a 1lonre Sldentlal uSe_ Mr_ Sousa believed that the strip o£proposed residential between the utility vault and Kie- Wit was inappropriate- He noted that the Busch property did a good job in garnering community support in fixing that property, and in providing a buffer between it and the residential neighborhood. He noted that any new residents would need a disclosure stating they were in an industrial part of the City_ He noted that other neighboring uses included the tiring range, the fire department, and the garbage company. He noted that Kie-Wit's current plans were to stay and operate- Rick Camacho5 3847 Vineyard Avenue, expressed concern about increased Livermore Airport noise if the plamied extension o£ the shorter runway X25 Le£t/7 Rights proceed~d~ He noted that the Airport Master Plan had been completed, and was being reviewed by the FAA, and he added that departing planes may cause more noise over Pleasanton and any potential new housing. He noted that transportation of aggregate would continue on El Charm, and pointed out that the local aggregate was high quality and served an ixrxportant purpose in local construction. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED_ Commissioner Roberts suggested that this item be brought back before the G'ommission because of the multitude of issues to consider. In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Maas, Mr. Swift replied that Council would prioritize the planning-related undertakings for the next year. He anticipated that updating the Land Use and Circulation Elements would remain on the priority list. Council has requested staff to present a process for addressing the W_ Las Positas interchange, and its possible elimination from the General Plan. He expected that would be a high priority for the Council, and that it was part o£the comprehensive Circulation Element_ Commissioner Maas noted that the findings would drive the process with respect to planning traffic circulation £or the area_ Mr. Swig noted that the City G'ouncil would leave the Land Use and Circulation Elements as a priority. He noted that the previous City Council did not choose to do a separate East Pleasanton study, but that this Council may choose to implement that study. In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Roberts, Mr. Iserson confirmed that a policy in the Housing Element would follow up General Plan Amendments and rezonings of those properties that may be converted to residenti al within a year. The State is very interested in having the Land Use Element completed within a year. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES February 12, 2003 Page 16