My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 05:340
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2005
>
SR 05:340
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2005 2:58:10 PM
Creation date
12/1/2005 2:47:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
12/6/2005
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 05:340
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Option 3: ModiCy the Program by deCerring the payment oC the Cees until a building <br />permit is obtained. <br /> <br />A third altemative "W'ould be to collect the fees at the time building permits "W'ere paid, at least as <br />to those residential units that are in the Hillside Residential designated areas. The rationale for <br />collecting the fees at that time "W'ould be that, unlike lots in areas designated Lo"W' Density <br />Residential, Hillside Residential lots "W'ould more likely be custom lots developed over time by <br />individual property o"W'ners. To require Specific Plan fees (currently at $50,000/lot) to be paid <br />"W'ith a parcel or final map "W'hen the property o"W'ner/subdivider had no immediate plans to build <br />on all the lots could "W'ork a financial hardship on that property o"W'ner. <br /> <br />Staff does not recommend that altemative, ho"W'ever. First, for administration, it is far easier to <br />collect the fees "W'hen the map is being processed rather than at the building permit stage. Fees <br />collected at the building permit stage typically apply city "W'ide or to one large subdivision. (For <br />example, the City collects the Tri-Valley Conservancy fee on a per lot basis "W'hen a building <br />permit is obtained for property "W'ithin the Ruby Hill subdivision.) Second, given the <br />infrastructure improvements that remain to be built "W'ithin the Specific Plan area, "W'hich <br />improvements are to be funded by the City to the extent sufficient specific plan fees have not yet <br />been collected, collecting the fees "W'ith the parcel/final map "W'ill reduce the City's having to <br />advance funds. Third, typically "W'e expect the developer of a custom lot subdivision to front the <br />cost of the infrastructure to serve that development (and then to recover that cost through the <br />price of the lot) rather than have the custom lot purchaser pay the direct infrastructure cost to the <br />City. <br /> <br />FISCAL IMPACT <br /> <br />Adoption of the proposed amendment to the Financing Program "W'ill result in some portion of <br />the Specific Plan fees being received later in time and, because the City is (currently) last in line <br />to be reimbursed, the City's receipt of those funds "W'ould be delayed. This deferral is balanced <br />by the fact that some property o"W'ners may "W'ait to subdivide if all the fees are to be paid at the <br />time of the first subdivision and by the fact that the City "W'ill eam interest on the amount to be <br />reimbursed. <br /> <br />RECOMMENDATION <br /> <br />Staff recommends that the Financing Program be amended as follo"W's: <br /> <br />Financing Program #7: Except as provided belo"W', for subdivision of Lots creating ne"W' <br />buildable lots, Specific Plan fees shall be paid for all lots allocated to the Lot at the time the first <br />final subdivision map for that Lot is filed for City approvaL For Lots that are vacant and <br />allocated only one ne"W' home, Specific Plan fees shall be paid at the time the first building <br />permit is issued. <br /> <br />SR:05:340 <br />Page 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.