SR 05:340 - Laserfiche WebLink

Another exception "W'ould be as to a Lot designated Hillside/Open Space. In those instances, once a map is approved that creates more than half the lots allocated to such Lot, then all Specific Plan fees for that Lot (to the extent they haven't already been paid) are to be paid. For example, assume a property o"W'ner has a Hillside/Open Space designated Lot that "W'ould allo"W' four ne"W' buildable lots in addition to an existing residence. The property o"W'ner "W'ants to create one ne"W' lot. The o"W'ner "W'ould pay the Specific Plan fees for the one ne"W' lot. (The o"W'ner "W'ould also be required under the Specific Plan to connect the existing residence to the shared infrastructure improvements and "W'ould pay a portion of the Fees relative to such connection.) Assume t"W'0 years later, the property o"W'ner "W'anted to create t"W'0 more buildable lots. The o"W'ner "W'ould be required to pay Specific Plan fees for the three remaining buildable lots even though only t"W'o "W'ere being created because, by reason of the second parcel map, more than half of the lots allocated to the Lot "W'ould be created by the second map. In addition, the amendment to Program #7 "W'ill clarifY that if a property o"W'ner "W'ith a vacant Lot obtains a building permit for that Lot, the property o"W'ner "W'ill pay the Specific Plan fee. 2. Amendment to Finance Program # 8 The amendment to Program #8 "W'ill provide that property o"W'ners "W'ith existing residences (and potentially buildable lots) "W'ho connect to the "W'ater and se"W'er system but do not subdivide "W'ill pay Specific Plan fees only for the existing home. If the o"W'ner connects to only one of the utilities, the o"W'ner "W'ill pay that portion of the Specific Plan fee attributable to that particular utility; the remainder of the fee for that home "W'ould be paid "W'hen the o"W'ner connects to the other utility. ** *** *** ** Although this Option may result in the City's receiving Specific Plan fees at a later time than in Option 1, staff nevertheless continues to recommend this Option. We do so because most property o"W'ners "W'ho "W'ill benefit by this Option have relatively fe"W' buildable lots. Staff is concemed that if a property o"W'ner is faced "W'ith paying the fees for lots that are not intended to be built upon in the near term, the property o"W'ner may decide not to subdivide in the near term, thereby delaying the receipt of any of the fees until some uncertain date in the future. It could also "W'ork a financial hardship on a property o"W'ner "W'ho "W'ants to develop just one or t"W'0 lots (but "W'ould under Option 1 pay fees for four or five lots) as "W'ell as a hardship on a property o"W'ner "W'ith an existing residence "W'ho "W'ants to connect to just "W'ater or se"W'er, but not both. SR:05:340 Page 6