SR 05:320 - Laserfiche WebLink

City Council Appeals Believing that the Planning Commission's action would be appealed to the City Council and that the appeal would be submitted on the very last day of the appeal period, the applicant appealed the Planning Commission's action early-on in order to place the item on the November 15th City Council agenda. Otherwise, the item would be delayed to the City Council's December 61h pub- lic hearing. Jerry Wagner submitted his appeal of the Planning Commission's action to the City Council on the last day of the appeal period. His reasons for the appeal are attached. Staff notes that the applicant has reviewed and finaled the floor areas for the proposal: 6,785 square feet of living area and 992 square feet of garage area totaling 7,777 square feet. The pub- lic hearing notice for this appeal includes these floor areas. Further analysis on the "Action of the Zoning Administrator" and the "Review Procedures" fol- lowed for this application in conformance to the Mariposa Ranch design guidelines is described in the attached Planning Commission staff report. II. SITE DESCRIPTION AND SURROUNDING USES The subject property is a 28,314 square foot (0.65-acres) parcel. It is a vacant site, gently sloping downward towards Clubhouse Drive, and directly faces Lot 10 on the opposite side of Clubhouse Drive and obliquely faces the No. 3 fairway of the golf course. Surrounding uses include the Callippe Preserve Golf Course, vacant land zoned for single-family homes on various-sized lots, and permanent open space. III. PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING On October 19, 2005, the Planning Commission heard PAP-87, the appeal by Jerry Wagner of the Zoning Administrator's approval of PDR-482. Jerry Wagner (6344 Alisal Street), Vanessa Kawaihau (871 Sycamore Road), and Kevin Clouse (871 Sycamore Road) spoke in favor of the appeal. The applicant, David Quartaroli, his architect, Terry Townsend, and Roger Manning (1300 Happy Valley Road) spoke in opposition of the appeal. Minutes of the public hearing are attached. The Commission's discussion and queries to staff during the public hearing focused on the pro- posal's conformance to the Mariposa Ranch design guidelines and the nitrate issue. Staff stated that the proposed project conformed to the design guidelines. With respect to nitrates, staff stated that there are no changed circumstances to warrant changing the original conditions. The Planning Commission voted 4-0-1 (Commissioner Anne Fox abstained) to deny the appeal thereby upholding the Zoning Administrator's approval ofPDR-482. SR 05:320 Page 3 of 8