SR 05:304 - Laserfiche WebLink

EDAW IHe WORr; PROGR,/l.M TR,/lNSIT_ORIENTED SPECIFIC PLAN FOR TI-E Hi\CIENDA ElUSINESS PARK particular importance will be timely decision modes by I-Iacienda employee's and residents. making by property owners, and prompt r~sponsc Information on where Hacienda employees live by City staff. and where Hacienda resident \vork will also be sought. Detailed Summary of Fehr and Peers and 6. 'Nork with the City of Pleasanton, the Hacienda Ellen Greenberg's Work SCOpHS: Owners Association and other consultants to Fehr and Peers: determine what programmatic transportation demand measures should be (lssumed as part of Fehr and Peers will prepare a tv\.'c, phase ,^'ork the Specific Plan program (e.g. shuttles, parking controls, ridcsharing incentives and similar scope. The Phase 1 will focus on existing measures that arc independent of the built conditions and trip forecasting methodologies, as environment). outlined below: 7. Meet with the City to and HEr to discuss the 1. Work with the City of Pleasanton, the Haciend<'l results of this analysis regarding trip Owners Association and other consu'itants to internalization, mode shifts, and other factors determine Hacienda Business Park's overall modifying standard trip generation rates for key vehicle trip budget, based on current HBP uses (Office, Residential and Retail). development entitlements. This determination 8. Synthesize the information gathered in Tasks 2- represents an essential first step, as it will define 7 above into vehicle trip generation rates for the the upper limit of vehicle trip generation for a three major uses at HBP. Rates will be Specific Plan project to be considered "I:rip established for three time frames: daily, AM neutral" by the City of Pleasanton. peak hour and PM peak hour. 2. Review available data on vehicular trip Y. Summarize data issues and concerns remaining, generation rates applicable to Haciendil Business if any. If significant and devise a Phase I B action Park TOO, including trip generation studies by plan of ground-level traffic counts and surveys the Institute of Transportatitll', Enginee~s (ITE). of employees, residents and retail customers at A key reference will be the Trip GCI1cratio/1 HBP. Handbook: All ITE I~ecommcndcd Practice (2001). This will be used to develop a baseline level of Phase I B: Fehr & Peers and JO Franz Associates will trip generation for the project,. this b,ls{Cline is conduct original research into observed and reported expected to be somewhat lower than th' HBP employees' and residents' travel behavior, as unmodified single-use rates found in the ITE well as their response to potential altl'rnativl' Trip Cel1f.'ration manual. transportation improvements. 3. Review available data collected by Fehr & Peers . Identify up to six sites (e.g., two sites each and others on the effects of the 40s: de:lsi~y, representing the three major existing and diversity (mixed use) and design and proximity planned uses with HEr' -. Office, Residential to regional destinations. Translate the5e 40 and Retail) effects into modifications to the base trp generation rates. . Conducting full traffic counts (all travel modes) at the six locations using ITE 4. Work with other members of the team, especially methodology, Additional sites can be Ellen Greenberg, to incorporate evidence from counted for approximate:y $1,000 - 1,500 per Case studi!:'s in other areas of the count:ry IOGltion. regarding trip generation information ,1pplicable to current and planned IlBP land uses . Analyze the site traffic counts to revise vehicle trip generation rates for the three 5. Review the US Census and other available major uses at I IBP. Rates will be established sources (such as the Metropolitan Trarspnrtation for three time frames: daily, AM peak hour Commission regarding current use of travel and PM peak hour. ~~