SR 05:304 - Laserfiche WebLink

EDAW INe WOR~, PROGRAM TRANSIT.O'<:IENTED SPECIFIC PLAN FOR THE Hf,CI=NDA BUSINESS PARK documents. The imp;1Ct analysis of Specific Plan . JD franz Research, Inc will conduct;l survey traffic will be conducted for two future development to gather statbtically valid information on horizon year scenarios. travel behavior deemed to be imporlan: but missing at tht' end of PhJse lA. This could We will identify traffic impacts based on the include questions regarding the efficacy of significance criteri;~ agreed to by the City. Mitigation individual alternative tran::.portatior services measures will be identified for impacts that exceed the th(lt may be implemented in conjunction with thresholds of esti'lblished significance criteria. These the HBP TOO plan, e.g. transit options measures will emphasize travel demand management (feeder buses/shuttles), w<1lkwJY and and effective alternJtives to automnbile. bikeway improvements, and parkin:~ controls/ pricing. Fehr & Peers will consult with EDA W in the development of evaluate the project circulation plan, The Phase "I B scope of work also includes up to three including implementation of alterni'ltive additional meetings with City and HBP staff and other transportation facilities and travel demand measures, consultants to describe the findings oJ this phase. and provide one set of recommendations for the initial plan's site access and circulation. Phase 1 includes preparation of J memorandum Fehr & Peers will assist the project team in summiHizing our i'lnalysis approJch and results. The formulating project i'llternatives, and will qualitatively memo will also specify steps through which the evaluate up to two alternatives to determine whether resulting relationships between TOD and vehicle trip they would lessen or eliminate the significant impacts generation should be implemented in conjunction identified for the proposed project. This evaluation with the City of Pleasanton's traffic forecasting model will be based on a comparison of the relative trip for the Specific Plan. generation characteristics of the alternatives. This evaluation will form thl' basis for the CEQ^ analysis The rl'sult nf Phase I will be a method that fairly of the Specific Plan. represents the vehicle trip reduction benefits of lOU that can be used for general level planning and For the final Specific Plan, Fehr and Peers will make comparative evaluation land use altcrnative~;. Under detailed recllmmendations regarding needed this proposed work scope, the trip generatio:l formula transportation and parking facilities for all travel will be developed in a form that allmvs for modes. Cost estimates for these recommended straightforward modification or post..proces:;ing of the mitigation measures will also be developed City 01 Pleasanton's traffic forecasting model results to predict changes in trip generation resulting from TOO Fehr and Peers Optional Tasks: development levels within Ilacienda Business Park Beyond this contract, the methodology can te Public Meetinqs integrated with the City's standard modelin:~ procedures to allow it to be used in all TOO As an optional task, one Fehr & Peers staff devdl1pment trnffic impact analysE'S. member "V ill attend up to two public meetings The Phase 2 work scope will focus on implementation (c.g., Planning Commission, City Council, public steps: hearing) regarding the project. The cost for this task is listed separately in the cost estimate. Summarize of Existing and Future Trans:g!lJgtion Conditions: Using the City of P1easanton traffic model Optional Task: Assist with Response to and other available data, we will determine thl' Comments relevant transportation conditions under ex'sting iJ.:, well as future conditions, with and without thE As an optional task, Fehr & Peers will assist in I Iacienda Business Park TOO Specific Plan. Fehr & formulating responses to the public comments Peers will coordinate with the City to identify received on the Draft EIR. The level of effort required appropriate criteria for measuring the significance uf for this task will depend on the number and project impacts. The criteria will be based on policies magnitude of comments received; therefore, if this of thl' General Plan and other regional planning task i:; desired, a separate cost estimate will be C':~