SR 05:260 - Laserfiche WebLink

3, Appropriate relationship of the proposed building and its site to adjoining areas, in- cluding compatibility of architectural styles, harmony in adjoining buildings, attractive landscape transitions, and consistency with neighborhood character; The Zoning Administrator found that the architectural style was consistent and compati- ble with the existing structure. 4, Preservation of views enjoyed by residents, workers within the City, and passersby through the community; The Zoning Administrator found that the proposed project will not block views enjoyed by residents, workers within the City, and passerby through the community, Viewsheds shared between residents on either side of the subject site will be altered, but not neces- sarily negatively so. Therefore this finding can be met. 5, Landscaping designed to enhance architectural features, strengthen vistas, provide shade, and conform to established streetscape; No landscaping was proposed as part of this project. There has been discussion, however, that any additional trees for screening may be employed by the Diaz' upon completion of the construction to enhance the site. 6, Relationship of exterior lighting to its surroundings and to the building and adjoining landscape; No additional lights are being proposed with this project. Any lighting added must be standard building lighting. No up-lighting will be permitted. 7. Architectural style, as a function of its quality of design and relationship to its sur- roundings; the relationship of building components to one another/the building's colors and materials; and the design attention given to mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or buildings; The Zoning Administrator found that the architectural style is compatible with the neighborhood and the function of the design and relationship to the surroundings. No me- chanical equipment or other utility hardware was proposed with this project. 8. Integration of signs as part of the architectural concept; and No signage was proposed with this project. 9, Architectural concept of miscellaneous structures, street furniture, public art in rela- tionship to the site and landscape, (Ord. 1612 S 2, 1993; Ord. 1591 S 2, 1993) No miscellaneous structures, street furniture, or public art were proposed with this pro- ject. Item 6,c,. PAP,80/PADR,I271 Page 4 of5 July 27, 2005