My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 05:220
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2005
>
SR 05:220
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/18/2005 4:49:36 PM
Creation date
9/30/2005 3:23:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
10/4/2005
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 05:220
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />customers, and one incident of a resident making aU-turn on the street, She believed the <br />pick-up and drop-off appeared to be fairly standard. <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Blank regarding traffic-calming measures, <br />Ms, Nerland stated that the Fire Department did not support speed bumps on residential streets, <br />Ms. Decker added that traffic-calming measures were generally associated with certain levels of <br />service; this street had a LOS A and would not be impacted to need a reduction, <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Roberts regarding possible enforcement ifthese <br />conditions were not met, Ms. Nerland replied that traffic enforcement would be addressed by the <br />Police Department. The standards for granting a conditional use permit were generally lower <br />than to modify or revoke it for cause because it becomes a right that runs with the land. <br />Chairperson Maas noted that the phone numbers for large family daycares were generally <br />available. She added that with respect to noise enforcement issues, it would be possible for a <br />blended family to have up to 14 children but would not have the same car traffic for pick-up and <br />drop-off. She believed that traffic and safety issues for the neighborhood should be the primary <br />concern for the Commission. <br />Commissioner Roberts suggested that the traffic issues be re-visited in six months, Chairperson <br />Maas believed that would be too long if there was a problem and suggested a three-month <br />interval instead, <br />Commissioner Fox noted that daily trips may not be regulated because State law allows a parent <br />to visit the daycare at any time. <br />Ms. Decker noted that this was a public street and that the neighborhood may call the Police <br />Department or Code Enforcement Officer whenever something was amiss. She noted that staff <br />has always been attentive to those issues. <br />Ms. Nerland noted that the issues addressed by the Commission should be traffic, parking, and <br />noise, and not the number of children, <br />Commissioner Maas moved to make the required use permit findings and to approve <br />PDUP-7 as recommended by staff, with the following modifications: <br />1. A meeting between the appropriate City representative, the neighbors, and the <br /> applicants be held every 45 days of the first year of operation to discuss traffic, <br /> parking, and noise issues; and <br />2. The neighbors and the Suttons be encouraged to work together regarding the <br /> number of children in the daycare; <br />Commissioner Fox suggested an amendment that the flier prepared for existing and future <br />clients state that daycare patrons should not keep their car running during the pick-up and <br />drop-off period and that they should not use their car horns during that time; and that the <br />phone number of the Suttons be distributed to the neighbors so they would be encouraged <br />to call the Suttons in the event of a problem. <br />EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES, May 25, 2005 Page 5 of6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.