SR 05:256 - Laserfiche WebLink

The Consultant immediately began identifying the various activities offered in the Downtown area, so that the overall size and program for the proposed building would be adequate to meet the demand. Fixture count, precise site location, building orientation, etc. were established. To receive input on the actual architecture for the building, the Consultant held a meeting on July 26, 2005, with various City staff (Planning, Public Works, Support Services, Parks, and Landscape Architecture) and two (2) designated representatives from the Pleasanton Downtown Association (PDA). The group discussed a variety of issues, including: site furnishings, fixture types, preferred building materials, signage, and security lighting. It was the consensus of the group that a traditional "Railroad Style" of architecture be pursued. DISCUSSION The Railroad-style architecture is based upon the traditional, functional, and somewhat utilitarian architectural designs that were prepared for station houses (and other ancillary structures) for rail stops in cities and small towns throughout the west. It has been compared to "Craftsman Style" architecture, although it is simpler, and imbued with less design detailing. It is the design style of the existing two-story commercial building located at 30 West Neal Street, the former SPRR depot. The review group felt that since the commercial building is visible from the project site, it sets a thematic precedence for the proposed restroom structure. Translating this style of architecture to the public restroom project would result in a functional building of approximately 650 square feet in overall size. Design details would include: horizontal wood siding, pitched roof, vine-covered walls, exterior drinking fountain, and benches (refer to Attachment I). It should be noted that ELS Architects is also under contract for the design and adaptive re-use of the old Firehouse building on Railroad Avenue. The existing building is also "traditional" in its appearance (rectangular building masses, traditional materials, etc.); however, its proposed re-design would result in a structure that is much more contemporary in appearance. Designing a restroom structure that reflects some of the design elements of this notable City building also has merit, and was recognized by the review group - although it was not the consensus choice. Design details would include: curved wall with overhead trellises, flat composite roof, exterior drinking fountain, and benches, similar to the design previously supported by the Council in May 2005 (refer to Attachment 2). Based upon a preliminary cost opinion, the Consultant believes that the restroom facility can be constructed within the City's established project budget (approximately $290,000), regardless of which architectural style is chosen. As the building's size, location, construction materials and other matters can all be selected to satisfy the direction provided by the Council, the only remaining decision-point is the building's actual architectural style. An attractive building with a look of permanence and civic quality is the desired outcome, so we are asking the Council to choose a preferred architectural design now in order to maintain the project timeline of having the restroom facility completed by June 2006. SR 05:256 Page 2