My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 05:259
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2005
>
SR 05:259
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/16/2005 12:13:11 PM
Creation date
9/15/2005 4:27:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
9/6/2005
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 05:259
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />VII. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT <br /> <br />Environmental review for the proposed project was undertaken with the Final Environmental <br />Impact Report (EIR) approved by the City Council for the Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specific <br />Plan in conformance with the standards of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). <br />There are no substantial changes to the project or to the circumstances under which the project is <br />being undertaken that involve new significant environmental effects or that substantially in- <br />crease the severity of previously identified effects. Furthermore, there is no new information of <br />substantial importance, which was unknown at the time that the Final EIR was approved by the <br />City Council regarding the project or its effects, mitigation measures, or alternatives. Any pre- <br />viously identified effects or impacts are mitigated to a level of insignificance, with the mitiga- <br />tion measures incorporated into the project's design or imposed on the project pursuant to the <br />conditions of approval. Therefore, no new environmental document accompanies this staff re- <br />port. <br /> <br />VIII. CONCLUSION <br /> <br />The proposal is compatible with and sensitive to the constraints posed by the site, in keeping <br />with the themes and policies of the Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specific Plan, and consistent with <br />the approval of PUD-05. Staff notes that it is not uncommon for the construction of PUD de- <br />velopment plans to be phased and, in terms of site design, project grading, and site topography, <br />the previously approved project lends itself to the proposed phasing. As proposed and condi- <br />tioned, the Berlogar portion of PUD-05 would be self-sufficient in terms of access, utilities, etc., <br />and would provide utility "stubs" to the westerly side of the Chrisman property. Except for the <br />modifications covered by this application, all previous requirements and conditions would re- <br />main in effect. <br /> <br />IX. STAFF RECOMMENDATION <br /> <br />Staff recommends the Planning Commission take the following actions: <br /> <br />I. Make the finding that the proposed modification of PUD-05 is covered by the Final Envi- <br />ronmental Impact Report (EIR) approved by the City Council for the Vineyard Avenue <br />Corridor Specific Plan; <br /> <br />2. Make the findings for the major modification of the approved PUD Development Plan <br />stated in the Planning Commission staff report; and, <br /> <br />3. Recommend approval of PUD-05-1M subject to Exhibit "B", Draft Conditions of Ap- <br />proval. <br /> <br />Staff Planner: Marion Pavan, (925) 931-5610, fnTH1Van(cI:cUz.le.asanlon.ca,lls <br /> <br />Item 6.c.. PUD-05-1M <br /> <br />Page 9 0{9 <br /> <br />August 10, 2005 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.