Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Other jurisdictions have adopted ordinances regulating medical marijuana dispensaries. <br />The City of Oakland has adopted regulations for the location and operation of up to four medical <br />marijuana dispensaries, defined as distribution to four or more patients. The City of Berkeley <br />adopted a zoning ordinance to limit the number of dispensaries to the three already existing <br />within City limits, but abandoned a further regulatory scheme given uneasiness with issuing city <br />use permits for uses prohibited by federal law. The City of Fresno adopted an ordinance <br />prohibiting medical marijuana dispensaries defined as a primary caregiver providing medical <br />marijuana to three or more qualified patients. In April 2005, Americans for Safe Access (a <br />nonprofit advocating medical marijuana use located in Oakland) filed a lawsuit to declare <br />Fresno's ordinance a violation of the Compassionate Use Act. This case is pending. <br /> <br />DISCUSSION <br /> <br />Activitv since August 16, 2005 <br /> <br />Since the City Council meeting on August 16,2005, staff has received another inquiry <br />about establishing a medical marijuana dispensary in Pleasanton. The individual who called <br />said that he and his business partner had been trying to open or buyout a dispensary in San <br />Francisco and had run into obstacles, so were now looking in the Tri- Valley area. In the midst <br />of the ongoing conflict between federal and state laws regarding medical marijuana and the <br />increasing number of jurisdictions adopting moratoriums on medical marijuana dispensaries, <br />staff recommends that the City Council extend the existing moratorium on medical marijuana <br />dispensaries to provide sufficient time to analyze the matter and protect the public health, safety <br />and welfare. The Pleasanton Municipal Code currently does not define or regulate medical <br />marijuana dispensaries either through a Police Department permitting process or through land <br />use regulations. Thus, a person interested in opening such a dispensary might argue that the use <br />is similar to a pharmacy, medical office or limited retail use and locate in a number of zoning <br />districts without any further review. <br /> <br />Letter to Congressional Representatives <br /> <br />At the Council meeting on August 16,2005, staff understood that the Council wanted <br />staff to explore whether an effective regulatory scheme of medical marijuana dispensaries could <br />be crafted. Staff will be formulating points for later discussion and guidance to staff in drafting <br />such regulations. In the interim and in response to an idea raised at the Council meeting on <br />August 16,2005, staff has prepared the attached letter to U.S. Senators Dianne Feinstein and <br />Barbara Boxer and U.S. Representatives Richard Pombo and Pete Stark suggesting that the <br />federal government consider declassifying marijuana from a prohibited Schedule I drug to a <br />Schedule II drug. Such an action would allow marijuana to be dispensed through the existing <br />pharmaceutical channels (i.e. pharmacies, hospitals, etc.) with a doctor's prescription within the <br />existing framework of federal laws. <br /> <br />SR: 05: 261 <br />Page 4 <br />