Laserfiche WebLink
The neighbors had the following questions and concerns regarding the <br />church's vision: <br />(~: How were the future membership numbers and thus the space needs arrived at? <br />A: There is a general rule to build for no less than double the current membership and <br />there are studies that indicate certain common plateaus within church growth <br />historically. Site and zoning constraints places some limits on what was possible. <br />(~: What has changed since the previous plan to put mob#e buildings on site to expand <br />the pre-school? <br />A; As part of the planning process members looked carefully at their priorities and <br />realized expanding the pre-school was not a priority; few members have young children. <br />Focus has shifted to the creation of a multi-purpose room to alleviate the problems of <br />having multi-uses for the worship space. Additionally, pre-school expansion would not <br />be practical because codes would require an expansion of outdoor space that is not <br />practical at this site. Pre-school expansion is not in the current master plan. <br />(~; Why have the issues of aesthetics and maintenance not been dealt with? <br />A: The church is waiting for plan completion to start Phase z of construction which will <br />include some of these improvements. <br /> (~: Can the cross be illuminated? <br />A: Don't know. <br /> (~: What are the fifason's bu#ding out back? <br />A: A small patio for wedding photos etc. <br /> (~: What about noise and disturbances from parties at the tVasonic Hall? <br />A: Has not been a big problem and the Mason's don't want it to become one. <br /> (There is no record of formal complaints filed with the City.) <br /> <br /> C~: Can current membership numbers financially support the long term plan? <br /> A: Growth is required to fund all three phases. <br /> <br /> Q: What is the projected cost? <br /> A: All three phases, $8-10 million. Phase I, approx. $1.5 million. Constructions costs <br /> have gone up over the time the project has been delayed causing frustration among <br /> members who have given money towards the project. <br /> <br /> THE NEIGHBORS' CONCERNS AND NEEDS were outlined in the notes from the <br /> August 8m meeting (copies distributed). Highlighted interests included: <br /> <br /> Residents wanted: <br /> <br /> 1. No driveway permitted on National Park Road <br /> <br /> 2. No parking lot put on the National Park Road edge of the site (where the current <br /> '~ammer head" is proposed) and no parking spaces immediately behind houses on <br /> Bryce Canyon Court <br /> <br /> 3 <br /> <br /> <br />