Laserfiche WebLink
3.05.a. Would the proposed project result in an increase in pollutant discharges to receiving <br /> waters? <br /> <br /> The proposed landscaping and turf management program are to be implemented in <br /> accordance with best management practices. In addition, site runoffwater would drain <br /> ~hrough a series of bio-swales and/or underground drainage lines into detention basins <br /> that would permit natural infiltration of substantial water prior to the remainder entering <br /> into receiving waters. Any potential chemical pollutants used for the current hay fields <br /> would drain directly into the receiving waters. Staff feels that the proposed Project <br /> would not result in greater pollutant discharges. <br /> <br /> X <br /> May be Insignificant Insignificant <br /> Significant if Mitigated <br /> <br /> 3.05.b. Would the proposed project result in siguffieaut alteration of receiving water <br /> quality during or following construction? <br /> <br /> Water required during construction would be limited primarily to dust control that would <br /> be typical for developments on acreage the size of the Project area. The amount of <br /> proposed sprinkler irrigated turf area is confined mostly to the immediate playfield areas. <br /> A computerized irrigation system would be used to minimize the potential for over~ <br /> watering through constant monitoring that responds to climatic conditions. Native <br /> grasses requiring far less water than turf are planned in the areas surrounding the <br /> playfields to conserve water. Stafftherefore feels that the Project would not result in a <br /> significant alteration of receiving waters. <br /> <br /> X <br /> May be Insignificant Insignificant <br /> Significant if Mitigated <br /> <br /> 3.05.e. Would the proposed project result in significant increased impervious surfaces and <br /> associated increased rnnoff? <br /> Impervious surface areas would be limited to paving for streets, driveways, and possibly <br /> some trails and other pedestrian areas (approximately 10 percent of the site) and several <br /> small ancillary buildings (less than one percent of the site). Staff, therefore, feels that the <br /> increase in nmoff would be minimal. In addition, potential increased runoffwould be <br /> contained within the existing storm water detention basin during times of major rains. <br /> <br /> X <br /> May be Insignificant Insignificant <br /> Significant if Mitigated <br /> <br /> <br />